1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pychu [463]
3 years ago
9

Garrett Morgan invented?

History
2 answers:
pav-90 [236]3 years ago
4 0

Traffic light,and gas mask.

Over [174]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Gas mask and traffic light

Explanation:

You might be interested in
what was the political and religious significance of the "bloody coups" for the northern kingdom of Israel?
ahrayia [7]

Answer:

xcept for perhaps Moses, there is no greater hero in the Bible than David. He is introduced as the lad who single handedly defeated the mighty Philistine giant Goliath (1 Samuel 17). After a bitter conflict between the supporters of King Saul and of David finally ended, the elders of Israel came to David at Hebron and anointed him king over the entire people (2 Samuel 5-3). David’s long rule—more than 40 years—is seen by the Bible as a golden age.

The crowning of David as king was a threat to the Philistines. They attacked David’s forces twice but were repulsed both times. After that, the Philistines were no longer a major military problem for David.

David next turned to capturing Jerusalem. The city, despite two centuries of Israelite settlement all around it, had remained a Canaanite stronghold. David, however, was able to conquer it when his general Joab climbed the city’s tsinnor, perhaps a watershaft that led into the city, and surprised Jerusalem’s inhabitants. After having ruled from Hebron for seven years, David moved his capital to Jerusalem.

Jerusalem emerged as not only David’s political capital, however; he turned the city into Israel’s religious capital as well. He brought the Ark of the Covenant—which had accompanied the Israelites during their desert wanderings and which had accompanied them into battle–to Jerusalem. David also made plans to build a temple in the city atop the threshing floor he purchased from Araunah the Jebusite (2 Samuel 24-18), but the actual construction of that building would be accomplished by his son and successor.

David had a personal guard that formed the core of his army. In keeping with his initial victory against Goliath, the Bible portrays David as a great military leader. Once the Philistines were no longer a menace, David expanded his state to the east. He defeated the three nations on the other side of the Jordan River—the Moabites, the Edomites and the Ammonites. As a result, David ruled an area from the Red Sea to the Euphrates River. His power over the further reaches of his empire, however, was likely minimal.

The nature of David’s rule is the subject of ongoing debate among historians today. Some see the Biblical description of him and his empire as reasonably reliable (those academics are sometimes called Biblical maximalists). Others, however, see him as a minor local chieftan, if they even accept that he lived (they are called Biblical minimalists). The minimalists had been bolstered until recent years by the fact that there had been no reference to David outside the Bible and by the lack of finds from tenth-century B.C.E. Jerusalem. That is no longer the case, however.

In the early 1990s, excavators discovered a ninth-century inscription that mentions the “House of David,” no doubt a reference to the David’s dynasty. Recent excavations in Jerusalem have also changed our understanding of the city in David’s time. A massive stone retaining wall, called the Stepped-Stone Structure, was repaired during David’s time and certainly supported a very significant building above it. In 2005, archaeologist Eilat Mazar discovered a very large building just upslope from the Stepped-Stone Structure and which dates to the tenth-century B.C.E. She suggests the building was David’s palace.

The question of who would succeed David became a bloody one. His oldest son, Amnon, was killed by Absalom, David’s third son; Absalom, in turn, was killed by Joab, David’s general, for leading a revolt against the king (2 Samuel 15-19). That left David’s fourth son, Adonijah, as the heir apparent. But David promised his wife Bathsheba, with whom he had had his famous affair years earlier, that her son Solomon would inherit the throne. David’s retinue united around David’s choice.

After David’s death, Solomon moved quickly to solidify his rule. At the first sign of revolt by Adonijah, Solomon had his rival and his supporters killed or exiled. As a result, soon after ascending to the throne, “The kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon” (1 Kings 2-46).

Solomon enjoyed an unprecedented period of peace. His only possible threat, Egypt, attacked and captured the city of Gezer. But Egypt was relatively weak at this time, and the pharaoh moved to mend relations with Solomon. Pharaoh gave Solomon his daughter in marriage and gave him Gezer as a dowry (1 Kings 3-1).

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of the 1830 decree issued by mexico?
Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

to stop all Americans from entering Texas.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK brainliest can someone text me and help me with my unit review?? social studies
Volgvan

Answer:

Sure, 908-978-9089

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
True or False: Mexicans and Mexican Americans did not live in Minnesota until the 1980s.
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

What was true for Mexicans has been true for most other Latinos as well. ... with a Minnesotan woman and they made their life together in Minneapolis. ... Together, these organizations became spaces where Mexican immigrants were not ... Latino workers had a mixed relationship with organized labor.

I hope this helps!

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Nineteenth-century imperialists claimed they were fulfilling a "civilizing mission" in their overseas conquests. To what extent
taurus [48]
In the US part of imperialism is to create a better, more civilized world. It was connected to the idea of "city upon a hill" and Manifest Destiny. 

In colonies such as the Philippines, Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Guam, the US introduced school and up-to-date public facilities. A system of democracy was introduced to create self-government. 
Of course, there was an economic gain from all of these places and counters the goal of spreading culture. Resources were gained and markets created. In Hawaii, economics drove the annexation and then culture followed. 
The late 19th century held a belief in Social Darwinism. This belief held that some people were superior to others and so domination over them was expected if you were the dominate species. Most Americans also believed humans were broken into further species with each race being its own species. This means that "lesser humans" needed to be controlled for their own protection.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the counter-Reformation
    5·2 answers
  • What was roosevelt new deal was designed to?
    5·1 answer
  • What did the Bantu Authorities Act do?
    14·1 answer
  • Pumili ng iyong nais na paraan upang mailarawan ang katangian ng isang matiwasay na lipunan
    12·1 answer
  • In the early 1800s, many people in the United States migrated westwards because
    8·2 answers
  • What is the name of the 5th country
    7·2 answers
  • How did the civil service help to maintain the stability of the Roman Empire?
    15·2 answers
  • What two men were not in athenians
    8·1 answer
  • CANT ANYONE POST HISTORY QEUSTIONS!!!!
    11·2 answers
  • Order the correct progression of major focus in United States foreign affairs. Revolution, Isolation, World War I and II, Cold W
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!