What happens to the chart as you update its data table?

Last year Christine worked as a consultant. She hired an administrative assistant for $15,000 per year and rented office space (

mel-nik [20]

Answer:

Explicit costs - $51,000

Explicit costs are those for which a person incurs in actual spending of money. In this case, Christine had to pay $15,000 in wages, and $36,000 in rent ($3,000 x 12). These are expenses that she had to pay money for, and that had to be accounted for in the accounting books, and in the financial statements. These are in other words, explicit costs.

Implicit costs - $40,000

Implicit costs are simply the opportunity costs. An opportunity cost is the cost of the next more valuable alternative when faced with two or more options. No money is paid for this costs. The implicit costs for Christine were the $40,000 that she not receive as wages if she had continued working at a real state firm.

8 0

3 years ago

g Brandon and Jane Forte file a joint tax return and decide to itemize their deductions. The Fortes' income for the year consist

murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

$1,500

Explanation:

Investment interest expenses = Interest Income + Non qualifying dividends

Investment interest expenses = $500 + $1,000

Investment interest expenses = $1,500

$1,500 < $2,500 (Investment interest expenses)

The long term capital gains are not considered in investment income because this income is taxed at a preferential rate. Hence, the Investment interest expenses deduction for the year is $1,500.

8 0

3 years ago

Do you think it is easier to increase or decrease government spending

Anna35 [415]

It is much easier to increase government spending, because it gives a temporary boost, whereas decreasing it would take away the benefits you had before, and might mess up other "things" that relied on that part you just removed to decrease government spending.

4 0

3 years ago

Laramie Labs uses a risk-adjustment when evaluating projects of different risk. Its overall (composite) WACC is 10%, which refle

Allushta [10]

The correct option is 3. A, B, and D.

The set of projects would maximize shareholder wealth is A, B, and D.

<h3>What is low-risk projects?</h3>

Low risk suggests that there won't be a significant negative effect on the organization should the project fail.

The computation of the provided data is displayed below, depending on the circumstance:

To determine which projects set would maximize shareholder wealth, we must compare the WACC to the anticipated return.

Below are some specific risk WACC (needed return) (%), expected return (%), and accept or reject reasons-

High 12 Project A 15 Select WACC is less profitable than anticipated.
The return for Project B's Average 10-12 Select WACC is less than anticipated.
WACC for Project C High 12/11 Reject is greater than anticipated return.
Low Project D 8-9 Select WACC is less profitable than anticipated.
WACC for Project E Low 8 6 Reject is higher than anticipated return.

Therefore, in order to maximize shareholder wealth, option C (projects A, B, and D) should be chosen.

To know more about low-risk projects, here

brainly.com/question/16031984

#SPJ4

The complete question is-

Laramie Labs uses a risk-adjustment when evaluating projects of different risk. Its overall (composite) WACC is 10%, which reflects the cost of capital for its average asset. Its assets vary widely in risk, and Laramie evaluates low-risk projects with a WACC of 8%, average-risk projects at 10%, and high-risk projects at 12%. The company is considering the following projects:

Project Risk Expected Return

A High 15%

B Average 12%

C High 11%

D Low 9%

E Low 6%

Required:

Which set of projects would maximize shareholder wealth?

A and B.
A, B, and C.
A, B, and D.
A, B, C, and D. A, B, C, D, and E.

5 0

2 years ago

Karson, the managing director of a multinational corporation, punishes his employees for coming late to work by deducting their

emmainna [20.7K]

Karson os using his authorities

7 0

3 years ago