<span>special words or expressions that are used by a particular profession or group and are difficult for others to understand.</span>
10) Answer: as an adult, the author recalled how sweet the anguish of first love was."
Explanation: The main theme for the story "First Love" is unrequited love. The author recalls her experience and what she learned from it.
11) Answer: hyperbole.
Explanation: Hyperbole is an exaggeration of an idea. Judith is exaggerating because she would not actually exchange her mother for a peasant woman.
12) Answer: this is a simile, and it is important because it shows how inferior Judith feels compared to Sophia.
Explanation: Any comparison that uses the word "like" is a simile. Judith thought that Sophia was so beautiful that she was compared to a gold statue, and this made Judith feel insecure.
13) Answer: metaphor
Metaphor is a comparison in which a word or phrase is applied to something not applicable. In this passage, Judith describes her feelings by comparing her heart to a chorus.
Answer:
D. To evoke certain reactions from readers
Explanation:
Language Evokes Emotion
To achieve their goals, authors make deliberate choices about the language they use.
Authors often want to evoke emotions in readers and their language choices help them do that. For example, authors may strive to:
- Create sympathy tor or antipathy towards a character.
- Access the reader's humanity.
- Engage the reader more fully in the events of story.
- Influence the way a reader approaches a topic.
Answer:
c She was disappointed, because her school was likely closed permanently
The propaganda technique that is an attempt to support a statement by simply repeating the statement in different or stringer more stringent terms is Circular reasoning.
<h3>What is Circular reasoning?</h3>
A logical mistake called circular reasoning, commonly referred to as circular logic, occurs when the reasoner starts with the conclusion they want to reach. Since the conclusion must be true if the premises are true, circular arguments are frequently logically sound. Circular reasoning, which occurs when the premises of an argument require just as much support or evidence as the conclusion does, is not a formal logical fallacy but rather a pragmatic flaw that prevents an argument from persuading. Other ways to say this include saying that there is no reason to believe the premises unless you already believe the conclusion, or that the premises don't offer any independent support for the conclusion.
A common example of circular reasoning is "A is true because B is true; B is true because A is true." If the circularity comprises a lengthy chain of premises, it may be challenging to identify.
To learn more about circular reasoning with the help of given link:
brainly.com/question/16153777
#SPJ4
