1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
finlep [7]
3 years ago
9

What was the major argument against the Constitution by the Anti-Federalists and what was added to alleviate their fears?

History
1 answer:
Katen [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:  Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, which would diminish the rights of the states and of individuals.  The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to alleviate their fears.

Further detail:

The Anti-Federalists had opposed ratification of the US Constitution.  The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states.  Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA.  They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.

The Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided some reassurance to Anti-Federalists after the fight over ratification, because these amendments to the Constitution served to guarantee that individuals' rights would be protected under federal law.

You might be interested in
What was a major difference between the fall of Austria-hungary and the fall of the ottoman empire
ArbitrLikvidat [17]

The correct answer is Ottoman territories were taken over by European empires, while Austria-Hungary was broken up in independent states.

<em>A major difference between the fall of the Austria-Hungary and the fall of the Ottoman Empire was that “Ottoman territories were taken over by European empires, while Austria-Hungary was broken up in independent states.” </em>

On October 31, 1918, the Armistice ended the fighting between the Ottoman Empire and the Allies. Britain kept the control of Iraq, Syria, and Palestine. The French and Greek forces marched to Constantinople. Finally, the Ottoman empire was divided and the capital, Constantinople turned in what today is Turkey. Regarding Austria-Hungary dissolution, it ended in October 1918, due to the movements of liberals politicians that supported separatism. The new countries formed after the dissolution were Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia.

4 0
3 years ago
why might the immigrants agents be interested in who paid for an immigrats's passage and how much money the immigrant had?
chubhunter [2.5K]
<span>Immigrants agents are responsible for identifying, investigating, and dismantling vulnerabilities regarding the nation's border, economic, transportation, and infrastructure security. They may be interested in </span><span>who paid for an immigrant's passage and how much money the immigrant had prior to arriving in the country, to determine the security threat or economic struggles that the immigrant would bring to the country.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Today, new york is the financial ___________ of the world, with a population of _____ million. 2. in 1776, new york has a popula
Nadya [2.5K]
1. capital, 8.5
2. 25 thousand
3. True
4. hundreds, 64, 24, sound



8 0
4 years ago
How did political divisions during the Cold War affect Korean War, the Cuban middle crisis, and the Vietnam war?
Sloan [31]
They started the korean war to prevent the spread of communism cause they associated communism with Russia. They did not like Russia . 
"The Cuban Missile Crisis was Russia getting ballsy and really mad at us (Likely due to us having missiles in Turkey that could hit them)
And the Vietnam War was started for the same reason as the Korean War"
6 0
3 years ago
What are so differences between the Boston Gazette and the London Chronicle?
Radda [10]

Answer:

The Boston Gazette was a newspaper published in Boston, Massachusetts, in the British North American colonies. ... On the other hand, the London Chronicle was a family newspaper of London during the Gregorian era. It was first published in 1757, and its publications appeared three times a week.

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • One achievement of the Scientific Revolution that changed the way natural events are studied is
    13·1 answer
  • Beginning at the Philadelphia Convention in 1787, there has been a struggle between those who want a ____ and those who want a _
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the maji maji rebellion fail? east africans lost faith in their spiritual leader moments before the battle began. german
    5·1 answer
  • After the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act, many free African Americans
    10·1 answer
  • How did the king of England respond to the Olive Branch Petition?
    10·2 answers
  • Which was a cause of the Hundred Years' War? A. France refused to allow English merchant ships to dock in French ports. B. The F
    10·2 answers
  • The president of the Confederacy was:
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following laws led to slavery in Virginia?
    8·2 answers
  • Can someone please help me answer this question?
    11·1 answer
  • The period of United States history when there was much expansion is called"
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!