1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rudiy27
3 years ago
5

What reforms did Stalin attempt to improve the Soviet Union

History
1 answer:
Pachacha [2.7K]3 years ago
4 0

During the Khrushchev era, especially from 1956 through 1962, the Soviet Union attempted to implement major wage reforms intended to move Soviet industrial workers away from the mindset of overfulfilling quotas that had characterised the Soviet economy during the preceding Stalinist period and toward a more efficient financial incentive.

Throughout the Stalinist period, most Soviet workers had been paid for their work based on a piece-rate system. Thus their individual wages were directly tied to the amount of work they produced. This policy was intended to encourage workers to toil and therefore increase production as much as possible. The piece-rate system led to the growth of bureaucracy and contributed to significant inefficiencies in Soviet industry. In addition, factory managers frequently manipulated the personal production quotas given to workers to prevent workers' wages from falling too low.

The wage reforms sought to remove these wage practices and offer an efficient financial incentive to Soviet workers by standardising wages and reducing the dependence on overtime or bonus payments. However, industrial managers were often unwilling to take actions that would effectively reduce workers' wages and frequently ignored the directives they were given, continuing to pay workers high overtime rates. Industrial materials were frequently in short supply, and production needed to be carried out as quickly as possible once materials were available—a practice known as "storming". The prevalence of storming meant that the ability to offer bonus payments was vital to the everyday operation of Soviet industry, and as a result the reforms ultimately failed to create a more efficient system. During the period of Stalinism, the Soviet Union attempted to achieve economic growth through increased industrial production. In 1927–28, the sum total of Soviet production of capital goods amounted to 6 billion rubles, but by 1932, annual production increased to 23.1 billion rubles.[1] Factories and industrial enterprises were actively encouraged to "achieve at whatever cost",[2] with a strong emphasis placed on overfulfilling stated targets so as to produce as much as possible. For example, the slogan for the first Five-Year Plan, "The Five-Year Plan In Four Years!",[3] called on workers to fulfill the state's objectives a year earlier than planned.

Frantically rushed production was very common in Soviet industry, and in particular a process known as "storming" (Russian: штурмовщина, pronounced shturmovshchina) was endemic;[4] it involved crash programs in which factories tried to undertake all their monthly production quota in a very short space of time.[4] This was usually the result of a lack of industrial materials that left factories without the resources to complete production until new supplies arrived at the end of the month. Workers then worked as many hours as possible to meet monthly quotas in time; this exhausted them and left them unable to work at the beginning of the next month (although lack of raw materials meant there would have been very little for them to produce at this point anyway).[4]

To encourage individual workers to work hard and produce as much as they possibly could, most workers in Soviet industry were paid on a piece-rate; their wage payments depended upon how much work they personally completed. Soviet workers were given individual quotas for the amount of work they should personally deliver and would earn a basic wage (stavka) by fulfilling 100 percent of their quota. The wage rate for work would grow as production over this level increased. If a worker produced 120 percent of his own personal quota for the month (for example, if he was supposed to produce 1,000 items, but actually produced 1,200) he would receive his basic wage for the first 100 percent, a higher rate for the first 10 percent of over production and an even higher rate for the next 10 percent. Soviet authorities hoped that this would encourage a Stakhanovite spirit of overfulfillment of quotas among the Soviet workforce. In 1956, approximately 75 percent of Soviet workers were paid under such a piece-rate system,[5] so the majority of Soviet workers could significantly boost their earnings by increasing their output.[6]

Average wage rates in the Soviet Union were published relatively rarely. Some academics in the West believed this was because the Soviet government wanted to conceal low average earnings. Alec Nove wrote in 1966 (when wage statistics were published for the first time since the Second World War) that the lack of transparency surrounding average wages was intended to prevent Soviet workers from discovering the huge disparities that existed between wages in different sectors of the Soviet economy.<span>[7]</span>

You might be interested in
Im not too sure about this one, any help ?
Tom [10]
The answer would be footbinding.

It would restrict the growth of the feet to make women appear more attractive to men back then. It was a symbol of wealth and power.


Face veils were more commonly used in the Middle East. Makeup was not as widespread back then and elaborate hairstyles weren’t as popular in China.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is Lake Baikal an example of Russia's new committment to managing and protecting natural resources?
erik [133]

lake Baikal is one of Russia's national treasure

5 0
3 years ago
What is an non example of popular sovereignty
swat32
Dictatorship would be a non example of popular sovereignty
3 0
3 years ago
How many u.s. presidents have been impeached and tried by the senate? none 1 (bill clinton) 2 (andrew johnson and bill clinton)
sertanlavr [38]
3,Nixon was impeached, so was Johnson, Clinton was tried in senate<span />
7 0
3 years ago
Which conclusion about Michigan’s local government does the data support? The federal government provides about a third of the f
Temka [501]

The citizens of Michigan provide the largest percentage of funding through sales and property taxes is the conclusion about Michigan’s local government.

Option C

<u>Explanation</u>:

The Michigan has a very extensive and diverse transportation system which is primarily funded by federal and state user fees i.e., through the gasoline tax, diesel tax and the vehicle registration fees deposited at the Michigan Transportation Fund (MTF).

In 2017, $1.2 billion was contributed from vehicle registration fees, $1.4 billion from fuel taxes and $40 million from vehicle title fees. So, the citizen of Michigan offers huge percentage of funding through the taxes.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the end of World War 1 affect the economic opportunities available to women and African Americans?
    8·1 answer
  • Identify a method scientists use to share information with one another
    14·1 answer
  • The boss of slaves working in the plantation fields was the __________.
    6·1 answer
  • Abraham licoln fought to preserve what?
    6·1 answer
  • Which was NOT a duty of serfs?
    15·1 answer
  • In The Prince, Machiavelli advises rulers to
    14·1 answer
  • Natural barriers isolated ancient China from other countries for much of its history. A barrier is something that keeps two area
    8·1 answer
  • What are 5 rights that you would want to protect and why
    15·1 answer
  • What culture group lived in the great basin region
    6·2 answers
  • What is the Iron Clad Causes about ?? Please
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!