Answer:
great plains D
Explanation:
This is the answer on edge or time4
Civil Rights Activists
Explanation:
Because if you look up the first amendment on google it shows
This passage we can say is a direct response the critique of indulgences raised by the Protestant reform.
In other words this could be a direct answer to Martin Luther and his 95 thesis, in which the selling of the indulgences, that is the forgiveness of sins in exchange of money, was the main issue. The Church states that the Christ himself gave the right to them to sell the indulgences and that that is the time-honored tradition.
Some of the differences between the Athens jury practice and modern Unite States are:
1. Athens only allowed a very small group of men who owned property and who had completed their military training and were resident in Athens to vote. Women, slaves, children and foreigners were excluded from being full citizens and could not Vote.
2. In Athens, the elections were done through a system of lottery not by choosing a particular person to run for office.
3. Athens elected people did not have to have a special legal training unlike the modern US, where people have to go into a law school to work as a judge or lawyer.
4. People were arrested by citizens no by a formal police and they were tried and defended by other citizens rather than lawyers.
5. Adult male citizens who had the grace of voting had to go to the Athenian assembly on a regular basis to debate and vote on important issues like going to war, they also acted as jurors in the law courts.
<em>The only similarity</em> between the two was the fact that they were both democracies where people were given authority in the political system.
