1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AleksandrR [38]
3 years ago
5

Write an equation in slope-intercept form with a slope 3/2 and a y-intercept -2.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Wittaler [7]3 years ago
6 0
The answer in slope intercept form would be y=3/2x-2
You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Can you teach me how to do these?? plzaa
Nitella [24]
If we are simplifying, ⅜ ab³a⁴ is
⅜a^5b³. when multiplying like bases you add exponents

second is xy²/2. when dividing like bases you subtract exponents
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the diagram below to answer the questions. Line q contains points J, K, and M. Point P is above line q between points K and
Flauer [41]

Answer:

2nd 3rd and last option

Step-by-step explanation:

2.

3.

6.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A survey asked students to choose their favorite social networking website. The results are shown in the table.
katovenus [111]
The answer is 27.5




Aaaaaaaaaaaaa
6 0
3 years ago
A Hexagonal pyramid is located on top of a hexagonal prism. How many vertices are there?
Scrat [10]

For a better understanding of the answer given here, please go through the diagram in the attached file.

The diagram assumes that the base of the hexagonal pyramid is an exact fit (has same dimensions as the face of the hexagonal prism).

As can be seen from the diagram, the common vertices are A,B,C,D,E,F which are 6 in number.

The bottom vertices are G,H,I,J,K,L, which, again are 6 in number.

The Apex of the pyramid, P is one more vertex.

Thus, the total number of vertices in a Hexagonal pyramid is located on top of a hexagonal prism will be the sum of all these vertices and thus will be:

6+6+1=13

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Simplify the expression using<br> order of operations<br> 12 (10-5) - 40 + (4+1)
    15·2 answers
  • Iodine-123 is a radioactive substance used in medicine. It has a half-life of 13 hours. A nurse received a solution that initial
    9·1 answer
  • Find the area of the parallelogram.
    13·2 answers
  • In survey 17/25 of the people surveyed have a cat. what percent of the people surveyed have a cat?
    10·1 answer
  • Find the number of the natural numbers between 101 and 999 which are divisible by both 2 and 5 in AP
    11·1 answer
  • Please help as fast as you can please!
    10·1 answer
  • Help ASAP Ill mark u brainliest
    14·1 answer
  • The truth or falsity of a statement ?
    11·2 answers
  • Anyone have a group I can join
    11·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ASAP!?? I RLLY NEED THIS
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!