The future amount in the account (Roth IRA) is equal to: D. $180,488. 86.
<u>Given the following data:</u>
To determine the future amount in the account:
Mathematically, the compound interest for this Roth IRA is given by the formula:
<u>Where:</u>
- t is the number of years.
Substituting the given parameters into the formula, we have;
A = $180,488.86
Read more on compound interest here: brainly.com/question/25263325
Answer:
The Full form of JTA is Job Task Analysis.
Explanation:
JTA) allows applications to perform distributed transactions, that is, transactions that access and update data on two or more networked computer resources.
Hope it helps! ◕ ‿ ◕
Sorry if it’s wrong! :(
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
1. Calculate the first year's net earnings under the cash basis of accounting, and the first year's net earnings under the accrual basis of accounting.
The first year's net earnings under the cash basis of accounting will be:
Service revenue = $23400
Less: Expenses = $14310
Net income = $9090
The first year's net earnings under the accrual basis of accounting will be:
Service revenue = $29500
Less: Expenses = $15500
Net income = $14000
2. Which basis of accounting (cash or accrual) provides more useful information for decision-makers?
It should be noted that the accrual basis of accounting gives decision makers more useful information. This is due to the fact that the decision makers will probably want to know the revenue and the expenses that were incurred for a particular period and every other necessary details.
Answer:
Option (C)
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
Price of salt increases by = 25%
Quantity of pepper demanded increases by = 4%
Cross price elasticity = Quantity of demand increases ÷ Price of salt increases
= 4% ÷ 25%
=0.16
Hence Cross-price elasticity of demand between salt and pepper would be positive.
So option (C) is answer
Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.
