In a situation wherein Country Y has a progressive tax system for income, with no credits or deductions, a CEO earning $2.5 million per year would pay the most as a percentage of income in the country Y. Therefore, the option D holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of a progressive tax system?</h3>
A progressive tax system can be referred to or considered as a system wherein the percentage of tax to be levied increases with an increase in the total taxable income for an individual. The rates of taxation under this system are defined under percentage.
In the situation given above, when a CEO in country Y earns $2.5 million, i.e., more than any other person mentioned above, he will be the one who will have to pay the most taxes as a part of percentage of his income.
Therefore, the option D holds true and states regarding the significance of the progressive tax system.
Learn more about progressive tax system here:
brainly.com/question/12416177
#SPJ2
Answer:
The future value of an annuity (FVA) is $828.06
Explanation:
The future value of an annuity (FVA) is the value of payments at a specific date in the future based on the payments being recurring and assuming a discount rate. The future value of an annuity (FVA) is based on regular cash flow. The higher the discount rate, the greater the annuity's future value.
Where:
FVA is The future value of an annuity (FVA)
P is payment per period
n is the number of period
r is the discount rate
Given that:
P = $195
r = 4% = 0.04
n = 4 years
substituting values
The future value of an annuity (FVA) is $828.06
Answer:
$11,026 Favorable
Explanation:
The computation of the spending variance for plane operating costs in November is shown below:
= Budgeted cost - Actual cost
= [(84 × $3,160) + (252 × $18) + $593,00] - $318,250
= $329,276 - $318,250
= $11,026 Favorable
Answer:
B) ROE is a forward-looking, one-period measure, while business decisions span the past and present
Explanation:
ROE is a forward-looking, one-period measure, while business decisions span the past and present, this statement does not describe a problem with using ROE as a performance measure.
Answer:
The three scenarios describe a competitive market.
Explanation:
1) In the competitive market buyers and sellers are price takers, this means that there are many producers and consumers and none of them are able to intervene in price and market. Price is given, ie price is determined by interaction in the market. 2) The products are identical. That is, no company will make a profit due to differentiated products. In perfect competition, companies produce identical products, and the consumer is indifferent to the product characteristics of each company. 3) There is free entry and exit of companies and factors of production, ie there is no cost to enter and exit any sector. This means that factors can migrate from one sector to another without incurring costs, meaning there are no barriers to entry and exit from any sector.
Thus, from items 1 and 2, consumers and buyers are price takers, that is, they cannot influence the price determined by the market. Item 3 is about achieving zero profit or normal long-term profit. This is because the free entry and exit of companies avoids extraordinary profits by encouraging companies to migrate to sectors that earn higher profits in the short term. Thus, in perfect competition, compa
