Answer:
Non-intercourse Act
Explanation:
In early 1800s, Britain and Freance were engage in a war that could determine their dominance within the European continent.A Problem occured when both of them actually asked United states to became their ally and actively attack the other opposition, They even start to block American ships who want to trade their goods outside to 'force' the US to be their ally.
The Congress saw this a big problem. So, to maintain United States neutrality, they passed Non-Intercourse Act in 1809. This act prohibit every single traders in united states to trade with Britain and France until the situation calmed down.
In 2014, about 65% Americans believed that stem-cell research is morally acceptable. This number shows a continous improvement from the previous years and shows no sign of slowing down, which opened up a really wide opportunities for funding to came in and accelerate our knowledge for this field and its applications in human lfie.
I believe the answer is: No, this does not need to be reported because it was assessed by the researcher as unrelated to the research study.
uanticiapted problem refers to the unexpected event that happen to the subject which is caused by the subject's involvement with the study. (This usually covers all form of physical harm and psychological damage that occurs because of the method of study or the substance that given to them during the study)
Answer:
Cones
Explanation:
Cones are the vision cells in the eye. These cells are found in the central part of the eye. These cells are mostly found in the fovea. Cones are in cylindrical shapes. These cells are responsible for color vision. These cells are found in three shapes
The S cells called small cells
The M cells called medium cells
The L cells called large cells.
These are also called the photo-receptors cells that are found in vertebrates. These cells have different capacities for different wavelength cells. These cells are responsible for color cells so these cells perform better in light.
Answer:
Regression.
Explanation:
As per the question, the source of internal invalidity that has not been taken into consideration here would be 'regression' as the conclusion is not based on reliable research and the key reason for research not being reliable is that it <u>selects the subjects(fifteen students who failed) based on extreme characteristics or scores('they all earned higher scores').</u> Thus, research becomes internally invalid as the deduction failed to consider 'regression' aspect and hence, could not proffer a justifiable and reasonable claim.