A set of playing cards that are only blots of ink are given to Mr. Lecter. On these cards, he is instructed to describe what he observes. Mr. Lecter is most likely completing a projective test.
In psychology, a projective test is an examination that frequently uses ambiguous stimuli, including inkblots (Rorschach Test) and mysterious images (Thematic Apperception Test), to elicit reactions that may reveal aspects of the subject's personality by projecting internal attitudes, traits, and behavioral patterns onto the external stimuli.
Less frequently, projective tests are also used to examine how people learn. Other projective techniques include association tests using spoken words as the stimuli, which require respondents to construct wooden block structures, finish phrases, paint with their fingers, or offer samples of their handwriting.
The usefulness and dependability of projective tests depend on a variety of factors, such as the degree to which identical personality interpretations can be made by various evaluators using the same test data and the degree to which those interpretations are supported by personality assessments from other sources.
Learn more about projective test here
brainly.com/question/10379868
#SPJ4
Answer:
Establishing Arabic as the official language throughout the empire
Explanation:
Answer: The Grocery store is the defendant
Explanation: A defendant is someone, company or an organisation being sued or accused of comiting a crime and is charged to court to defend his or herself, in the case of an organization or company being charged to court needs to defend and absorb itself of all crime.
In the case of Adrianna, the grocery store being the defendant needs to defend itself in court against Adrianna's claims and prove that it's not guilty of her claims. If found guilty the grocery store will pay for damages, her hospital bills and injuries the fall might have caused.
Answer:
The U.S. government made reservations the centerpiece of Indian policy around 1850, and thereafter reserves became a major bone of contention between natives and non-natives in the Pacific Northwest. However, they did not define the lives of all Indians. Many natives lived off of reservations, for example. One estimate for 1900 is that more than half of all Puget Sound Indians lived away from reservations. Many of these natives were part of families that included non-Indians and children of mixed parentage, and most worked as laborers in the non-Indian economy. They were joined by Indians who migrated seasonally away from reservations, and also from as far away as British Columbia. As Alexandra Harmon's article "Lines in Sand" makes clear, the boundaries between "Indian" and "non-Indian," and between different native groups, were fluid and difficult to fix. Reservations could not bound all Northwest Indians any more than others kinds of borders and lines could.
Answer:
millions of people died like husbands,etc so people lost there jobs but people were treated wrong because of there religion and nation
Explanation:
in the holocaust people were treated wrong because of nation and religion so those people had to go to concentraction camps where the killed and hurt and had them working A LOT they had very little to eat so they were very weak and beat them a lot too.
mark brainliest please if correct stay safe and wear your mask and don’t be a Karen jk but still stay safe
