The rhetoric's that was used in these speeches have been grouped below:
<u>Evil empire speech:</u>
- Portrayed the soviet union as an enemy.
- appealed to audiences sense of justice
<u>Tear down this wall speech:</u>
- appealed to audiences sense of morality.
- Challenged the soviet union to do the right thing.
<h3>Summary of the evil empire speech</h3>
This speech was delivered by Ronald Reagan during the cold war by the US and the Soviets.
He referred to the soviet as a force of evil that was a threat to the modern world.
<h3>Summary of the Tear Down This Wall" speech</h3>
This speech was given by Reagan to Gorbachev urging him to tear down the wall that they had built in Berlin.
Read more on the Soviet union here:
brainly.com/question/545380
This is definitely a “History” or “Politics & Government”” question, not “Travel” and I agree with Sue, you’re avoiding doing your own homework. I’m not going to do it for you, but I’ll try and put you on the right track.
The “Roman” institutions (caro amico napoletano, il ragazzo sta parlando della Roma antica, anzi di Bisanzio, che aveva un principio legislatvo ben diverso dal nostro, uno che “funzionava” per essere chiari) definitely influenced the Founding fathers. Some aspects are obvious (The Senate, Governors of Roman Provinces/US States, Ethics) others are less obvious (Representation, civil Rights of citizens, Fiscal system).
The basic differences are of “anglo saxon” inspiration (Pursuit of happiness, Common law, Inviolability of office).
The end result is a very interesting combination of both, which should make US citizens proud of their constitution and system of Government.
Compare Obama’s political platform with the Gracchi brothers, and both Bushes with the Dictator Sulla. You should get quite an interesting result.
The Justinian Code came very late in Roman History, when “Rome” had ceased to exist, and it’s spirit continued to live in Byzantium, in a very watered “Greek” community. In terms of law making, it is certainly interesting, because it is an attempt to sum up all that was positive in the “inherited system”, but it should not be taken out of it’s Historical context, unless you believe the US has reached the same stage of “decline”, which I don’t.
Stricter laws in Roman times? I would say more Draconian, according to the times.
Look up a description of Gibbons’ “Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire” and you should have enough background data to write your paper.
It was John Connally that was wounded by gunfire while riding in the presidential limousine when john f. kennedy was assassinated. <span>Governor Connally, riding in the same limousine in a seat in front of the President and three inches more to the left than the President, was seriously injured but survived. </span>
B. cullen works hard at multiple jobs to save money for college
