Answer:
In America, the presidential election system is not through the direct vote of the citizenry, but through the indirect election carried out by the Electoral College. Thus, each voting citizen gives his cast to a specific candidate, but said will must be endorsed by the electors of his state in the Electoral College.
In this regard, each state has the number of voters equal to the number of congressmen it has in the federal Congress. Thus, for example, states like Montana or Alaska have 3 electors (since they have 2 senators and 1 representative), while California has 55.
The problem is that, to determine the electoral votes of each candidate, it has been established that whoever wins the popular votes in the state takes all the votes of the electors of that state (except in the case of Maine and Nebraska). For this reason, it may happen that a candidate in California defeats his opponent 50.1% to 49.9%, in what would be almost a technical tie, but takes 100% of the electoral votes. Thus, the right of citizens to the election of their representatives is violated, and a candidate who has not obtained the majority of the popular vote (as happened in 2016 with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton) could win in the Electoral College.
Thus, many candidates adopt the strategy of campaigning and giving all their effort in the states with the largest number of voters such as California, Texas, Florida or New York, leaving aside other states considered less important.
Answer:
i think its him, if im wrong sorry -_-|| Lorenzo de Zavala
Explanation:
The correct answer should be
<span>Although
the conflict was indecisive, it boosted American nationalism because
the American army and navy proved they could stand up to the most
powerful country in Europe.
It can't be called a decisive victory or a defeat for anyone since the war ended in a stalemate and nothing got resolved. The situation returned to how it was before the war politically, except they didn't want to go to war anymore. This meant that no boundary changes occurred. </span>
<span />
Answer:
A. anger and frustration
Explanation:
Daniel Gray made a speech where he talked about how the people were critical of the government's handling of taxes which were too high, to fund a war.
He was incensed as he gave his speech to the people he gathered as he launched a scathing attack on the government and officials who occupied sensitive positions that made use of their taxes to pay for government projects which were bizzarely not taxed.
His tone in the speech was one of anger and frustration.
