The inference is that Wilson believed that it was both natural and inevitable that many Americans might want one European nation rather than another to be victorious in the war because many Americans <u>were immigrants from European nations.</u>
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
An inference is the conclusion deduced based on the information given in the story.
Here, Wilson also thought that by remaining neutral, America could perform a duty of counseling the warring nations about peace
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Answer:
Hedonism and utilitarianism are similar in their evaluation of the goal of moral behaviour as some version of pleasure or happiness and the minimization of its opposite. They can both view pleasure or happiness as simple and immediate, or complex and matured. Where they differ is the scope of evaluation which justifies the behaviour as moral. Hedonism tends to be individualistic while utilitarianism tends to be social. A utilitarian must evaluate the happiness result for the total consequence of an action, which typically effects many people. A hedonist could very well throw consequences to the wind if the action feels good to him or herself. In a sense, you might consider utilitarianism to be model for social hedonism.
Explanation:
The answers are B, C, and D
Answer:
A.ultimate truth
A. true
Explanation:
The statement "The Rule of Law was made its supreme maxim" means that the rule of law is the ultimate truth.
Rule of law is the system that states that no one is above the law, both the ruler and the ruled, which makes it the ultimate truth or supreme maxim.
Furthermore, the use of force has to be objective in order to ensure that rights are not violated and upheld properly.
This is true, because one approach doesn't fit all, objectivity is needed.
Answer:
it's answer 1: "improve people's working and living conditions"
Explanation:
research of history
