<em>Hello</em>
<em>your question:</em>
<u><em>what 17-year old woman won snowboarding gold at the 2018 olympics?</em></u>
<u><em /></u>
<em>answer:</em>
<u><em>Chloe Kim from Pyeongchang South Korea</em></u>
<u><em /></u>
<em>background explanation:</em>
<u><em>Chloe became the youngest winner of the snowboarding halfpipe gold medal. She scored 98.25 points, which was 10 more points than her closest rival in the competition.</em></u>
<u><em /></u>
<em>THANK YOU</em>
personally, I believe people will go without them, but it is also very possible people will look elsewhere for them, but its all a matter of perspective. I think that if the economy cannot produce the goods and services, no where else is able to either, thus, you'd go without it, and it isnt to say you wont want it. You will, maybe even more so. And I doubt people will focus on needs more than they already are, unless it gets worse for the consumer itself in that regard. I cant say im right though.
2580–2560 BCE 4th Dysnasty
Because of James Oglethorpe's assurance to impact social change, the province of the Carolina's was set up as a restrictive settlement.
Oglethorpe had come to Georgia with no formal title other than Trustee. In spite of the fact that he couldn't hold office, Oglethorpe was plainly the pioneer of the state, subject to guidelines and tenets declared by the Trustees back in London. In acknowledgment of his part, he is all around viewed as Georgia's first senator.
