The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the first choice. On the other hand, the answer for the second question is the second choice. I hope my answers has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
Ian is a uniquely good position here: the truth happens to be one of the best explanations he could possibly give. The fact that he quit his job to look after his sick mother, assuming that his former employer has positive things to say about him, is a solid reflection of his character and a sign that he was out of the job market not due to a lack of options, but a need to take care of a sick family member.
Ian should tell the truth, and explain the decision thoroughly to demonstrate the kind of person he is to the prospective employer, and what his priorities are.
Answer:
c. the cost of corporate advertising aired during the Super Bowl.
Explanation:
Financial statements show the financial position of a business for a given period, and the income statement compares revenue and expenses to get profitability of a business at a particular time.
Higado Confectionery Corporation has a number of store locations throughout North America. Since there is segmented income statement per store items like store manager salaries, store building depreciation expense and cost of goods sold at each store will appear in individual statements.
However when there is a corporate advertisement at the Superbowl all of the stores jointly benefit, so there will be a representation of this cost on all their income statements.
Answer:
A. the labor system would be as close to slavery as possible, thereby assuring high productivity.
Explanation:
The Reconstruction - era of northern version was clearly impacted on Slavery.
As the main objective of such reconstruction was to remove slavery at maximum. And with the end of such reconstruction era there was an end to slavery.
Accordingly, new constitutional rights to people earlier under slavery were provided.
Now, therefore, statement a in the given instance which provides for close relation between labor system and slavery is incorrect.
Incorrect Statement is:
A. the labor system would be as close to slavery as possible, thereby assuring high productivity.
For using $money$ in the near future but not right away.