1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lana66690 [7]
3 years ago
6

A proposed law is also known as a(n) a veto b. override c. appeal d. bill

History
2 answers:
dlinn [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Bill because that is when something like a law is being proposed in a government

igomit [66]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: it’s the picture

Explanation:

You might be interested in
I was born a German noble, but ruled Russia in the eighteenth century. I liked western ideas. I expanded Russia to the Black Sea
Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer:

D. Catherine the Great. She was a German princess before becoming the emperoress of Russia.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
HELP ASAP easy points
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

There was no clear winner.

Explanation:

I took the test.

hsjdbdidkbsis

3 0
3 years ago
Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Why did the proposal of Martin Van Buren and the committee on suffrage arouse such heated opposition at the New York state const
butalik [34]

Answer:

Because it suggested that all white males should have voting rights

Explanation:

Voting rights in America has been very contentious, with restriction placed on different categories of people... whites, males, females and blacks. These kept changing over the years and centuries accross different states in the United States. Martin Van Buren and the committee on suffrage suggested voting rights for for all white males in 1821 generating heated opposition.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the name of the phrase used to describe the U.S. intervention in the Korean War in the 1950s?
bonufazy [111]
The Korean war never been called anything else that I know of
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • "If protected conduct is made criminal and the law which does so remains unexamined for its substantive validity, its stigma mig
    13·1 answer
  • The Anti-Federalists believed in a loose, strict, or flexable interpretation of the Constitution?
    8·2 answers
  • What are some of things slave did in the south to help the union win the war
    14·1 answer
  • How did world war ii afect african americans?
    10·2 answers
  • In 1821, new mexico was a territory controlled by:
    12·2 answers
  • 2. Name two things that the Penobscot River provided to the Indians who lived by it.
    13·1 answer
  • List the following events in correct chronological order​
    13·1 answer
  • Research one of Solomon’s wise sayings and print it above in your best handwriting.
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!<br>Place each characteristic under either the Zhou dynasty or the Qin dynasty.​
    11·2 answers
  • Ano ang naramdaman mo para sa isang pangulong gumagamit ng wikang filipino sa kanyang pagbi igay ng ulat sa bayan? Maituturing b
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!