Absolutism was a very common form of government in Europe between the 16th and 19th centuries and defended the theory of the king's absolute power over the entire nation. The power of kings during the <u>Middle Ages </u>was considered limited compared to the absolutist period, as there was a lot of political fragmentation and the king's influence depended on a relationship of vassalage, in which the exchange of favors between kings and nobles guaranteed real power.
As modern nations were being structured, mainly England, France and Spain, and as trade resurfaced in Europe, a new social class emerged with great economic power: the bourgeoisie. For the bourgeoisie, the political and economic fragmentation that existed since the Middle Ages was not interesting, as it affected their business, mainly because of the differences in currency and taxes existing from one province to another (even in provinces of the same kingdom, there were these differences in currency and taxes).
The nobility, in turn, welcomed the concentration of power in the figure of the monarch as a way to guarantee control of the lands he owned. Thus, the concentration of power in the hands of the king was a demand from the rising bourgeoisie and also from the nobility.
John Adams was an American statesman, attorney, diplomat, writer, and Founding Father who served as the second president of the United States, from 1797 to 1801. Hope it helps lol
Explanation:
Answer:
There were a couple of reasons for moving to the southern colonies. The first would be that they were loosing in the North and wanted to try and pierce the South to get ports and some ground to wage war.
They also believed that many slaves would embrace their liberation and join their cause against their former masters.
If they captured the South ports they could transport troops and equipment a lot quicker and easier from the British West Indies.
And they thought that there were more loyalists in the South and that would mean more domestic manpower for holding the lines.
Answer:
The political effects of the Prohibition were people discontent, uprising of organized crime and constant maniestation against the ban.
Explanation:
The prohibition was the nationwide ban on sale and import of intoxicating beverages established in the eighteenth amendment. It lasted from 1920 to 1933 and it was abolished by another amendment.
First of all, the effects of it politically were that in the first place crime aroused, then a big number of people who believed it was unfair started to work against the amendment and illegal traffic of intoxicating beverages unleashed. The Prohibition had many flaws because it didn't punish or banned consumption so many people amazed big amounts of alcohol and drinks. Also, organized crime took the opportunity to create wealth and gather simpatisants. But population discontent was the biggest effect. Leading people to support a move against prohibition and to act against orders.
After the big depression started, the government couldn't afford to let a tax pass by and people to push further in the topic. So after many promotions by supporters, the prohibition stopped and everyone got something positive out of it.
