Answer:
One-way commute times may be long because affordable housing is distant from the job.
A working spouse could affect all three variables.
People might be very satisfied with their career as long as the income is high.
People may have a career following their passion, but have a low income or a long commute.
Explanation:
As we know that the study in college for graduation generally includes the three types of variables i.e. level of the income, job satisfaction and the one way commute
Now there are some ways that may be cofounded such as the one way commute could belong as if the house is far from the job, for the working spouse the above three variables could be impacted, when the income of the people are high they feel very satisfied and they follow their passion but they have the low income or long commute travelled at the same time
Answer:
Direct labor rate variance= $1,666 favorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The company produced 5,200 units in January using 2,380 direct labor-hours.
The actual direct labor rate was $19.30 per hour
<u>To calculate the direct labor rate variance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
Direct labor rate variance= (Standard Rate - Actual Rate)*Actual Quantity
Direct labor rate variance= (20 - 19.3)*2,380
Direct labor rate variance= $1,666 favorable
Answer:
It should continue the production in the short-run.
Explanation:
Given the unit produced by Mars Inc. = 100000 boxes.
The selling price of boxes = $4 per box.
The variable costs = $3 per box.
The fixed costs = $150000
The total sales revenue = number of boxes × selling price
= 100000 × 4
= $ 400000
In the short run, the firm should continue its production because it still covers the variable costs.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, the question is incomplete. Indeed, there is no question at all, just a series of statements.
What we can do is to comment on this case.
We are talking about the story of Bob Bell and Michael Sharpe.
Royalties were the main reason for this dispute. Bob Bell was the engineer that invented the bicycle trailer. Michale Sharpe would focus on Marketing the product due to his experience with computers and sales. Sharpe wanted both to share the financial risks but Bell considered it hos invention and wanted more royalties. Things went in the wrong direction, the situation got worse and they both hired lawyers in Toronto, Canada.
After disputes and legal actions, Bell won the case and he could expanse his business nationwide and signed an agreement with a Chinese company to sell the product. On the other hand, Sharpe made a 180-degree turn and started a fitness business.
