According to some scientists, if the earthy was to heat up that much then the polor ice caps would melt more and the sea level would rise potentially causing some areas of land to flood.
If pressure drops, then the temperature will also drop. hence the next will be colder than it was in the previous time. If I helped please drop me a like.
<span><span>Large nameplate capacity per plant, typically around 1 GW.
</span><span>Typically 90% capacity factor, maximizing output from the nameplate capacity.
</span><span>Small fuel transportation volumes as the fissionable material just isn't that big or heavy compared to equivalent fossil fuel BTU sources.
</span><span>Low CO2 per MWH on a full life cycle basis. ~12 grams which is only slightly more than wind / solar.
This is a reason nuclear is a much better source for one of the major pressing problems of today than fossil fuels: global warming.</span>No particulate matter pollution.No sulfur dioxide or other chemical pollution.<span>Low fatalities per TWH.
Nuclear is higher than renewables according to current statistics, but much, much lower than fossil fuel generation.</span></span>
Nuclear power generates lots of clean, stable energy.
Answer: Some consequences of building the road are that it will provide loggers access to highly-valued trees, provide a more accessible trade route for merchants and farmers, affect the wildlife and water quality in the area, and possibly cause indigenous populations to relocate.
Explanation:
<em>it would be b and c</em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em>it's the whole ''ecosystem''</em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
