Answer:
The poor economic policies of King Louis XVI
Explanation:
Answer:
The term "Socialist Party" applies to most of the political parties that are based on Socialism and that existed all around the world in different historical periods including the Socialist Party of America that was founded on 1901 in the U.S. Because this nad other Socialist Parties are based on Socialism they main ideas they promote is that the means of production including factories and farms should belong to all society and not to individuals or corporations, and in the same way society and individuals should be self-managed.
Considering this, one of the statements that describes the basic ideological belief of the Socialist Party is "All factories and farms should be owned and controlled by the people, not private individuals and corporations", because in Socialism the means of production that are all the elements related to production and money should be owned by all society and not by particulars
Explanation:
This is known as the printing press they put ink on words and pressed it onto paper this was way faster then writing whole books by hand
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Karl Marx was against capitalism that favored business, production and trading across the border. He was a believer of communism and hence wanted to restrict the business boundaries. He also said that capitalism promoted materialism due to which our present history is like this. If instead of materialism our history would have been based on ideas then it would have been way different than what it is now.
Hence, option B is correct
Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.
