1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Law Incorporation [45]
3 years ago
9

Which of the following describes an economic effect of European imperialism in Africa?

History
2 answers:
-BARSIC- [3]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is B) Little money was invested in technology or infrastructure not related to exports.

<em>Little money was invested in technology or infrastructure not related to exports describes an economic effect of European imperialism in Africa. </em>

The Europeans were only interested in money. Their investments and income were their only concern, meanwhile, the poverty of the African people increased. The African tribes lived in poor conditions, some in extreme poverty and the Europeans did not invest in infrastructure that benefit the communities, such as better roads for people, technology, machinery to do the work, and working conditions. The Europeans only focused on exports and its benefits.


Vesnalui [34]3 years ago
3 0

Little money was invested in technology or infrastructure not related to exports.

European imperialism emerged during the latter half of the Seventeenth century, continuing well into the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The carving of an overseas empire had political, economic and imperialist connotations. The continents of Asia and Africa had immense resources and potential manpower which could be utilized for improving and expanding the economic and political power of the colonizing European nation. This could be achieved by the exploitation of the colony’s resources, without thinking of utilizing resources for the benefit of the colony.

Further Explanation:

The African continent was the site of European aggression and Imperialism that emerged between the 1830s to the beginning of the 1900s. By the end of the mid-twentieth century, most of Africa, except the countries of Ethiopia and Liberia had been brought under European control and domination. The scramble for colonies emerged as a combination of social, economic and political factors. The era of industrial Revolution provided a great boost to the economy of the European nations, as their industries turned out high-quality finished products in bulk quantities. However, the home markets were getting saturated, and exports declined. The abolition of slavery severely hampered the availability of cheap manpower to work in fields and agricultural works, leading to decline in textile production and increase in prices. Also, with the progress of heavy industrialization, the political heads of European nations were driven by the ideals of nationalism and were determined to project the image of one’s nation as a power to be reckoned with, on the international front. Moreover, new territories had to be acquired to resettle the growing population of the European nations. A combination of all these factors led to the race for the scramble for Africa. The African societies usually tried to resist the European rule; however, the Europeans justified their rule over them on the basis of racial superiority and on the principles of modernity. It was not until after the Second World War that the African nations would unite in their struggle against European imperialism and fulfill their quest towards independence.

Learn more:

1. The supreme court is best characterized as?

brainly.com/question/1146662

2. Why was james madison sued, resulting in marbury v. madison? brainly.com/question/10442615

Answer Details:

Level: High School, Graduation.

Chapter: Rise of European Imperialism, 1800-1900s.

Subject: History.

Keywords:

Imperialism, nationalism, Industrialization, man power, racial superiority, modernity, Industrial Revolution.

You might be interested in
In Article I, Section 10, Clause 3, states are forbidden from keeping a standing army or navy. Why would the Constitution restri
kiruha [24]

Answer:

Option A is the right answer.

Explanation:

The constitution was implemented in such a manner that no state shall impinge upon the centralized powers of the Union Government.

Founding fathers have prohibited the use of standing army during the time of peace as it would affect the liberty of the nation. Federalists feared that the states would become tyrannical if the standing army is allowed by it. Hence, the founding fathers have mentioned in the constitution that the congress have the powers to raise money and appropriate funds for standing army for not more than two years.  

Anti-federalist favored standing army as it would safeguard the security of the citizens. But federalists felt that it would alarm the liberty and freedom of the nation and hence constitution allowed standing army but only during the time of peace it must be disbanded.

7 0
3 years ago
John Adams was an extremely well liked president.<br> True<br> False
IgorLugansk [536]

Answer: from what i've read he was liked so True

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pears’ soap makers used the same concept to compare __________.
Pepsi [2]
Father figures with childlike colonized people
6 0
4 years ago
"The blood of the slain, the weeping voice of nature cries, ''tis time to part." When he wrote that, he was urging the colonies
malfutka [58]

Answer:

Great Britain.

Explanation:

The foregoing is an excerpt from Thomas Paine's prose on the separation of the United State of America from the "whims and caprices" of Great Britain. The prose emphasized that the relationship between England and America at that time was unequally yoked, and this was not meant to be. The author was of the view that there was an urgent need for separation of the two countries. According to him, even nature supports his argument, considering the proximity between the two countries and the time both countries were discovered.  

5 0
3 years ago
Dillon’s rule i thank
vovangra [49]

Answer:

The idea that local governments are the creation of state legislatures is called Dillon's Rule.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What three major ways did England's war for empire impacted the colonies in north america?
    11·1 answer
  • Brainliest!!!<br><br> What do you think?
    5·1 answer
  • Nationalist movements in the ottoman empire resulted in growth and a stronger empire. independence or self-rule for many territo
    7·2 answers
  • Did the signing of the policy of appeasement and the signing of the Munich agreement do any thing to keep Europe out of war?was
    5·1 answer
  • &amp;. Which states have more natural boundaries? (this Is an inference question - you need to look at the map, but the answer I
    7·1 answer
  • Which two congressmen were huge supporters of internal improvements.
    10·1 answer
  • Which best describes ancient Greek warships? This question is in edge
    9·1 answer
  • 2 How did the South justity secession?
    12·1 answer
  • The South is divided into 5 districts under military control.
    14·1 answer
  • Why is it most likely that the Soviets objected to some of the language submitted in the first draft on the Geneva convention
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!