1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Montano1993 [528]
3 years ago
9

Why did Shakespeare’s noble character speak in iambic pentameter while commoners spoke mainly in blank verse or prose

History
1 answer:
Damm [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

To create a distinction between the educated nobility and the coarse lower classes.

Explanation:

Back in the time of Shakespeare, the nobles were generally seen and portrayed as wise people who had access to a superior quality education. Thus, writing their dialogues in such a noticeable metric like iambic pentameter differentiated them from the lower class less educated characters in plays.

You might be interested in
Which turn-of-the-century political movement emphasized conservation?
Mariulka [41]
The political movement that emphasized conservation at the turn of the century was the progressive movement.  The movement refer to an ide where the Government would focus more attention at the development of science and technology
4 0
3 years ago
Why did Andrew Johnson face difficulty implementing his Reconstruction plans?
miv72 [106K]
One of the main reasons why Andrew Johnson faced difficulty implementing his Reconstruction plans is because he face harsh opposition in Congress--both by Radical Republicans and Democrats alike. 
6 0
3 years ago
What does the movement of Allied troops reveal about their strategy? The Allies’ objective was to reach Japan as soon as possibl
sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

C. The Allies overtook outlying islands to make access to Japan easier.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
If you were assigned to propose a treaty ending the Great War in 1918, what would your goals be? What would be your primary reas
Serggg [28]
<span>If I were assigned to propose a treaty ending the Great War in 1918, my goals would be t</span>o establish a world federation that had more power than the League of Nations or even the UN. It would have its own army and the ability to tax nations.

Woodrow Wilson's 14 points were an alternative to the Treaty of Versailles and were excellent post war plans. Germany agreed to all of them and had they been followed would likely have prevented WWII. The reason they were not followed however was because France and Britain thought they were too soft, and the terms of the Treaty of Versailles they thought were more fitting. If this is for school base them off of Wilson's 14. 

1. No more secret agreements ("Open covenants openly arrived at"). 

2. Free navigation of all seas. 

3. An end to all economic barriers between countries. 

4. Countries to reduce weapon numbers. 

5. All decisions regarding the colonies should be impartial.

6. The German Army is to be removed from Russia. Russia should be left to develop their own political set-up. 

7. Belgium should be independent like before the war. 

8. France should be fully liberated and allowed to recover Alsace-Lorraine. 

9. All Italians are to be allowed to live in Italy. Italy's borders are to "along clearly recognisable lines of nationality." 

10. Self-determination should be allowed for all those living in Austria-Hungary. 

11. Self-determination and guarantees of independence should be allowed for 
the Balkan states. 

12. The Turkish people should be governed by the Turkish government. Non-Turks in the old Turkish Empire should govern themselves. 

13. An independent Poland should be created which should have access to the sea. 

14. A League of Nations should be set up to guarantee the political and territorial independence of all states.
<span>
Based on these goals and reasons, my treaty would be a little different then Treaty of Versailles.</span>

<span>In retrospect, the goal of the treaty ending the Great War, in 1918, should have been to prevent WWII, which turned out to be worse. </span><span>Unfortunately, the peace treaty that officially ended the conflict--the Treaty of Versailles of 1919--forced punitive terms on Germany that destabilized Europe and laid the groundwork for World War II. So... my treaty would hopefully actually end the Great War without causing, or "just not helping prevent" WWII.</span>

<span>The Treaty of Versailles also included a clause to create the League of Nations. </span>

<span>The US Senate never ratified this treaty. </span><span>Also, the US did not join the League of Nations, despite President Wilson's active campaigning in support of the League. So... hopefully mine would speed up this process.
</span>

I hope this helped! : )
Please Rate & Thank!
Please mark as Brainliest!

Have a wonderful day! : )
3 0
3 years ago
Choose and write down a quotation from the list provided.
goblinko [34]
Well what is the list provided?
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does Millar’s description of the Roman government compare to Polybius’ description?
    9·2 answers
  • Men are capable of unjust actions because it is in their interest to do them, and they prefer their own satisfaction to that of
    11·2 answers
  • In the past India’s people were divided into castes how did being in a low caste affect people’s lives?
    15·2 answers
  • What did the new jersey plan suggest?
    5·2 answers
  • South America is dominated by what sub-group of Christianity
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the Vikings?
    5·2 answers
  • Do you agree or disagree with Wilson's claim about the "recent course of the "Imperial
    8·1 answer
  • Competition between Rome and Carthage over trade in the Mediterranean basin led to the
    13·1 answer
  • Upper-class citizens who hold wealth and power.
    5·1 answer
  • During World War II, why did Japan strongly and passionately defend lwo Jima?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!