The Spanish missions in california differ from those in texas and new mexico, since California missions were indifferent with converting Native Americans.
<h3>What role did Spanish missionaries have in California?</h3>
The Alta California missions, also known as reductions or congregations, were communities established by Spanish colonizers of the New World with the goal of completely assimilating indigenous inhabitants into European culture and the Catholic religion. The first step would be to convert indigenous people to Christianity. The second option would be to pacify the lands in order to colonize them. A third goal was to acquaint the locals with Spanish cultural norms so that they might transition from mission to parish status as full members of the congregation. They were meant to be places of religious conversion as well as economic productivity.
To know more about Spanish mission visit:
brainly.com/question/11704401
#SPJ4
<span>Conquests gave empires more room to expand their cultures and peoples. It gave them more land to explore and more resources to find, which could then be used to fund future expeditions and conquests. The cycle continued as more land was picked up, more people were subjugated, and more resources were procured.</span>
The correct answer for 1 is
<span>b. trade and tribute gave the Aztecs more resources than the Olmec and Maya
Aztecs were known for having vast marketplaces in their cities where merchants gathered and traded not only food but also things like jewellery or gold or gems. They were known for trading all around them and Spanish people were amazed by it when they discovered it.
The correct answer for 2 is </span>
<span>b. peasant farmers made up the largest social class
Like in most places at the time, there were vast areas of land that were covered in crops and if there was no more land then the forests would be cleansed so that crops could be planted. This was common at the time.</span>
Answer:
The four main objectives of U.S. foreign policy are the protection of the United States and its citizens and allies, the assurance of continuing access to international resources and markets, the preservation of a balance of power in the world, and the protection of human rights and democracy.
Explanation:
Actually, no less a student of the United States than Andrei Gromyko once remarked that Americans have "too many doctrines and concepts proclaimed at different times" and so are unable to pursue "a solid, coherent, and consistent policy." Only recall the precepts laid down in Washington's Farewell Address and Jefferson's inaugurals, the speeches of John Quincy Adams, the Monroe Doctrine with its Polk, Olney, and Roosevelt Corollaries, Manifest Destiny, the Open Door, Wilson's Fourteen Points, Franklin Roosevelt's wartime speeches and policies, Containment in all its varieties, Nixon's détente, Carter's Notre Dame speech, Clinton's enlargement, and the Truman, Eisenhower, Nixon, Carter, and Reagan Doctrines. Far from hurling the country into a state of anomie, the end of the Cold War has revealed anew the conceptual opulence that has cluttered American thinking throughout this century.
(Back to Bedrock: The Eight Traditions of American Statecraft)
