Answer:
register with their states to vote.
Explanation:
The purpose of the voting registeration is to ensure that there is no illegal votes conducted to manipulate the resut.
Without the registration, citizens from other states could come to different states in order to vote for their candidates multiple times without getting detected
The efforts of senators and representatives to seek federally funded projects, grants, and contracts that primarily benefit the constituencies of a single district or state are commonly referred to as Pork barrel legislation.
Instances of Pork Barrel Governmental issues
Pork barrel burning through, and the convergence of cash and governmental issues stretch out back over 100 years in U.S. governmental issues. Abraham Lincoln, for instance, exchanged Nationwide conflict agreements to northern money managers in return for support occupations and mission support. On a more nearby level, the mid twentieth century New York government was overwhelmed by Tammany Lobby, a political association that as often as possible bargained government contracts for political power. Unbelievable instances of political reserves alert against pork barrel legislative issues, including a portion of the accompanying models.
- Gold country's Scaffold to No place
- Boston's Large Dig
Assuming that you've at any point seen political spine chillers, you'll rush to accept that legislative issues is a grimy game. In the imaginary world, lawmakers are much of the time degenerate people driven by ravenousness and individual addition, accepting kickbacks and trading Favors for the help of lobbyists and other significant powerhouses. Yet, that isn't true in reality, right? There are situations where cash, power, and political help abrogate the long-term benefit of all. One of these is known as pork barrel legislative issues.
Learn more about Pork Barrel Governmental issues here:
brainly.com/question/13648019
#SPJ4
Answer:
<h2> <em><u>A.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Instrinsic</u></em></h2>
Explanation:
#Carryonlearningg❤️
Answer:
C) would people still conform to the group if the group opinion was clearly wrong?
Explanation:
Solomon Asch research was designed to answer a straightforward question, namely: <em>would people still conform to the group if the group opinion was clearly wrong? </em>This research was made by Asch to test conformity in ambiguous situations. Two important conclusions of the research are that people tend to conform to the majority of the group of opinion even if they know their answer is wrong, and that the size of the group is important when deciding.
It would be completely false to say that works cited format is detailed, and you are not expected to memorize it. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "b". It is expected that a person memorizes the works cited format that is detailed. This is an important aspect.
