Their relation was they thought that they were saviors.
I think it really depends on what you believe in. However, if you're talking about a classification of a bi-racial child, then the child is most likely as to what ethnic the father is.
Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer:
Simply put because most people aren't biased and believe that both sides are equally bad, Republican & Democrat. So, they're left with not voting at all..
Explanation:
