Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer: 24.60 minutes (2dp)
Explanation:
The question is essentially asking that we find the Standard Time it takes to serve a customer.
To do this we would have to calculate the averages of the different elements and then use this to find the normal time which we can then use to find the Standard Time.
Element 1
= (3 + 4 + 4 + 3 + 3)/5
= 3.4
Element 2
= ( 9 + 8 + 10 + 11 + 10)/5
= 9.6
Element 3
= ( 7 + 8 + 6 + 7 + 8)/5
= 7.2
We then calculate the normal times by multiplying each of the individual means with their performance ratings.
That would be,
Element A
= 3.4 * 70%
= 2.38
Element B
= 9.6 * 110%
= 10.56
Element C
= 7.2 * 120%
= 8.64
We then add up the normal times to get the total normal time
= 2.38 + 10.56 + 8.64
= 21.58 minutes
Now we can solve for the standard time using this formula,
Standard time = Normal time (1+Allowance factor)
= 21.58 ( 1 + 0.14)
= 24.6012 minutes
= 24.60 minutes (2dp)
The time per unit customer served is 24.60 minutes.
If you need any clarification please do comment. Cheers.
Answer:
A. Collateral
Explanation:
Collateral is a pledge that is given to a person in exchange for a loan (of something). The pledge could be redeemed after the loan has been returned (along with whatever strings has come attached with borrowing the item).
~
Answer:
the acid-test ratio is 1.5 times
Explanation:
The computation of the acid-test ratio is as follows:
Acid test Ratio = Quick assets ÷ current liabilities
where,
Quick Assets is
= Cash + short tern investments + Account receivable
= $3,500 + $50,000 + $56,000
= $109,500
And, the current liabilities is $73,000
So, the acid-test ratio is
= $109,500 ÷ $73,000
= 1.5 times
Hence, the acid-test ratio is 1.5 times
A key aspect of participative leadership is: A. decreasing repetitive work.
<h3>What is
participative leadership?</h3>
Participative leadership can be defined as a form of leadership and management style that involves an invitation of all of the team members to join in the decision-making processes and proferring solutions to a problem.
Basically, a fundamental characteristic and key aspect of participative leadership is that it would help to decrease repetitive work in a business organization.
Read more on leadership here: brainly.com/question/25927714
