Answer:
Increase
Explanation:
Within the specific department of psychology, cognitive dissonance transpires while a personality possesses pair or extra incongruous ideas, beliefs, or values, or engages under an activity that works against one of these three, also undergoes psychological pressure because concerning such things. When a couple of activities either view does not remain psychologically compatible among all others, somebody will produce all their strength to modify them till they enhance consistently. "If at prime, you do not succeed, attempt, attempt repeatedly." According to the cognitive dissonance approach, attempting once more should <u>increase</u> whence enough thou worth of specific consequence of your struggles.
Answer:
(a) Entry for purchase of patent :
Patent a/c debit $600,000.
To Cash / Bank A/c. $600,000.
(b) Amortisation : (legal protection for 20 years) >> 600,000/20 = 30,000 per annum
Amortisation expenses -Patents $30,000
To Patents account $30,000
(c) Impairment Loss on Patents ac. debit 270,000 (see calculations below)
To Patents account 270,000
(Value of patents at end of 4 years = 600000-120000=480,000)
Expected future value = 210,000
Impairment = 480,000-210,000=270,000
Answer:
According to the situation given in the question, if a country's supply of loan able funds shift rights , then A) the net capital outflow will increase and so the exchange rate will fall.
Explanation:
According to the situation given in the question , the supply of funds available for loan, depends upon the national savings, so if there is high amounts of national savings available it means the funds are available for the borrowers, who are in need of funds for their investment projects. And the demand for funds available for loan comes from the domestic investment and net capital outflow.
If the supply of funds are high in the economy then obviously the interest rate will also come down and the net capital outflow will be more.
Answer:
Requirement 2
a) Net Operating Income (Loss) for year 1 under absorption costing = 110,600
b) Net Operating Income (Loss) for year 2 under absorption costing = 257,600
c) Net Operating Income (Loss) for year 1 under variable costing = 238,200
d) Net Operating Income (Loss) for year 2 under variable costing = 385,200
e) The cost of goods sold is always less under variable costing than under absorption costing.
Explanation:
a) Absorption Costing, also called full absorption costing, capture all costs associated with manufacturing a particular product, such that the direct and indirect costs, such as direct materials, direct labor, rent, and insurance, are fully accounted for using this managerial accounting method.
b) Variable Costing is a managerial accounting technique that assigns variable costs to inventory, so that all period (fixed overhead) costs are charged to expenses in the period incurred, while only direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead costs are assigned to inventory.
Answer: covariance matrix is
(0.00090 0.00042)
(0.00042 0.00160)
Mean of weekly return = 0.00119
Standard deviation = 0.0279
VaR(0.05) = $1450.73
Explanation:
> S1 = 200*100
> S2 = 100*125
> w1 = S1/(S1+S2)
> w2 = 1 - w1
> w = c(w1,w2)
> means = c(0.001, 0.0015)
> sd = c(0.03, 0.04)
> rho = 0.35
> multiply = w %*%
means> round(mutiply by 5)=0.00119
> cov = matrix(c(sd^2, sd[1]*sd[2]*rho,sd[1]*sd[2]*rho,sd[2]^2),nrow=2) = 0.00090, 0.00042, 0.00042, 0.00160
> sdp = sqrt( w %*% cov %*% w )> round(sdp,4)=0.0279
> VaR = -(S1+S2)*(mup+sdp*qnorm(.05))
=1450.73
