1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rewona [7]
3 years ago
11

What did England need before challenging rival nations in their quest for foreign territories?

History
2 answers:
kakasveta [241]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

<h2>They needed several things, but the most important, they needed a big naval force.</h2>

Explanation:

England was against several nations, like Dutch, Spain and France, which were a tremendous powerful force in the Sea, which was England's weakness. So, once they had naval power, they were able to face any altercation with any nation. They became so powerful, that they won territories in America that were under Spain and France domain.

So, these events say that England had well grounded goals.

gulaghasi [49]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

England needed a lot of things before challenging rival nations in their questo for foreign territories, however the principal thing was a strong and well established naval fleet.

Explanation:

England was part of the United Kingdom and they are an Island. So, the first thing they needed as a united entity was inside the order. But then, they required transportation. Thus, by being an Island the only access they could have with other territories was by sea. So they required to develop a strong and well developed naval fleet. The required strong and heavy-armed ships, so they could navigate through vast distances while having the ability to stand a fight anywhere with everything they had at their hands. They had to develop a strong navy fleet because they were behind their enemies and they had no style established. That's why they had to develop strong and heavy-armed ships. To counter heavy-armed and light boats from their enemies.

You might be interested in
The three results of the athenian surrender to sparta in 405 were the destruction of the long walls, the reduction of the atheni
ohaa [14]
The answer is True!!!!!!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which late 1940s event prompted the United States to take steps to protect itself from Soviet espionage? the detonation of a bom
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

the detonation of a bomb on Russian soil.

In 1949, the Americans were astonished to see that the U.S.S.R. had detonated their own atomic bomb (as a test) on their grounds. It had been only 4 years since the detonation of the atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and they considered it could not be sufficient time to develop the atomic bomb by themselves. Suspicion of espionage was their main option. Time proved them right. Nearly a dozen Soviet spies were convicted of passing information to the Soviets during this period about the atomic bomb in what was called the "Manhattan Project", the most famous spy being Emil Julius Klaus Fuchs. After this experience, the United States began to invest a large quantity of money in protecting their secret projects and fighting espionage.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The events above all played a role in unraveling of the relationship between the colonists and great britain.Which event do you
Rom4ik [11]

Before the act of emancipation was approved in July 1776, the Thirteen Colonies and the Kingdom of Great Britain had been at war for more than a year. Relations between the two had deteriorated since 1763. The British Parliament enacted a series of measures to increase taxes in the colonies, such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Act of 1767. The Legislative Body considered that these regulations were a legitimate means for the colonies to pay a fair share for the costs of keeping them in the British Empire.

However, many settlers had developed a different concept of the empire. The colonies were not directly represented in the Parliament and the settlers argued that this legislative body had no right to assign taxes. This fiscal dispute was part of a greater divergence between the British and American interpretations of the Constitution of Great Britain and the scope of Parliament's authority in the colonies. The orthodox view of the British - dating back to the Glorious Revolution of 1688 - argued that Parliament had supreme authority throughout the empire and, by extension, everything that Parliament did was constitutional. However, in the colonies the idea had developed that the British Constitution recognized certain fundamental rights that the government could not violate, not even Parliament. After the laws of Townshend, some essayists even began to question whether the Parliament had any legitimate jurisdiction in the colonies. Anticipating the creation of the Commonwealth of Nations, in 1774 the American literati - among them Samuel Adams, James Wilson and Thomas Jefferson - discussed whether the authority of Parliament was limited only to Great Britain and that the colonies -which had their own legislatures- they should relate to the rest of the empire solely because of their loyalty to the Crown.

8 0
3 years ago
How did Luther's ideas oppose the power of the church officials
Leto [7]
Because its created a religious devied between secular Christian religious Calvinists
4 0
3 years ago
the enumeration in the constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the peopl
Nikitich [7]

The mention of some rights in the constitution should not be understood to reject or degrade those held by the people. This assertion is correct.

The Rights Retained by the People helps us understand why and how this inequality in human rights protection has developed. It also provides a foundation for reforming constitutional interpretation and better protecting all human rights by emphasizing the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution.

The enumeration of some rights in the Constitution should not be understood to negate or degrade others possessed by people. It states that any rights not expressly granted by the Constitution belong to the people, not the government. In other words, people's rights are not confined to the rights enshrined in the Constitution.

To learn more about Rights Retained

brainly.com/question/28235501

#SPJ4

7 0
9 months ago
Other questions:
  • What important natural resource in west Africa did the Songhai empire control?
    12·1 answer
  • 30 POINTS!!!!! How did technology help unite China under the reign of Qin Shi Huangdi?
    12·2 answers
  • 4. "Fortunate Son" was originally written about the grandson, David Eisenhower, of President
    14·1 answer
  • What principles of law did Romans develop
    8·1 answer
  • The Ka'aba Question 24 options: a) represented the monotheism of the Bedouins. b) was the shrine in Mecca containing a large bla
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the government break its treaty with the Nez Perce?
    5·2 answers
  • What role did Poland play in the start of World War II?
    14·1 answer
  • Where did Mexicans migrate from and to? What were some of the reasons they migrated?
    12·1 answer
  • True or False: the phenotype of an organism is determined by its genotype.
    10·2 answers
  • Use the maps below to answer the following question:
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!