1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nuetrik [128]
4 years ago
14

The compromise of 1850 introduced popular sovereignty as a way to decide the slavery question in new territories? True or false

History
2 answers:
Vitek1552 [10]4 years ago
7 0

answer would be true.

faust18 [17]4 years ago
4 0

The compromise of 1850 introduced popular sovereignty as a way to decide the slavery question in new territories is an True answer.

You might be interested in
Was Polk right to send Taylor into disrepute territory
nevsk [136]

Answer:

James K. Polk ran for president in order to establish the border of the American portion of the Oregon Country. He also wanted to settle the border between Texas and Mexico.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
when president cleveland tried to restore the queen to power, hawaii's leaders refused. why do you think they did this? what eco
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

People like Sanford Dole needed the island to be part of the United States to ensure their entrance to American sugar markets.

Explanation:

Hawaii was a kingdom until 1893 when American planters established corp to overthrow Queen Liliuokalani. Hawaii became a republic in 1894. In 1840, a constitutional monarchy was established, stripping the Hawaiian monarch authority. The economic reasons have contributed to the overthrow of the Queen from power. American planters generated money in Hawaii through sugar plantations. Sugar exports to the United States expanded greatly over the period, and American investors and sugar planters on the islands increased their domination over affairs to establish their control over the people in Hawaii.

6 0
3 years ago
King Nebuchadnezzar attacked the Israelite city of ________ in 586 BC, and the people were taken captive as exiles to Babylon.
irina [24]

Answer:

Jerusalem.

Explanation:

King Nebuchadnezzar lay siege to the capitol city of the Kingdom of Judah, Jerusalem, in 597 BC, while Judah was under the rule of Jehoiakim. Nebuchadnezzar took away as captive the<em> ruling class of Judah</em> (nobles), as well as the <em>men of war</em> (soldiers), <em>merchants</em> (merchant-class) and <em>crafters</em> (such as masons, builders, etc.) It is mostly noted that only the poor of the land and those who were not Jews were left primarily in the land. The Holy Land also was settled by other people groups who were settled there by the Babylonians.

Learn more about the Exile of Israel, here:

brainly.com/question/615814?referrer=searchResults - The significance of the exile.

4 0
2 years ago
What result did Lincoln want to encourage with the Emancipation Proclamation?
Mashutka [201]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Emancipation Proclamation didn’t actually free all of the slaves. Since Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a military measure, it didn’t apply to border slave states like Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, all of which were loyal to the Union.

The Emancipation Proclamation did more than lift the war to the level of a crusade for human freedom. It brought some substantial practical results, because it allowed the Union to recruit black soldiers. To this invitation to join the army the blacks responded in considerable numbers, nearly 180,000

8 0
4 years ago
A. Summarize the McCulloch v. Maryland Supreme Court Case [this will help you with your status update #1 on your social networki
Wittaler [7]
McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819), was a landmark ruling by the supreme court of the united states. the state of Maryland had tried to impede the running of the branch of the second bank of the united states by inflicting a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the second bank of the united states was the exclusive out-of-state bank then being in Maryland, and the law was acknowledged in the court's opinion as having precisely targeted the U.S. bank.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the Columbians exchange?<br> B. A trading post established by Christopher Columbus
    13·1 answer
  • How did Renaissance thinkers imply that the church was backward and barbaric? A. By undermining the church's authority among mem
    12·2 answers
  • Why did Southerners resist the increased tariff in 1828, arguing it should be nullified?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the Black Death affect medieval Europe?
    8·1 answer
  • Choose all of the options that apply. (able to choose more than one)
    12·2 answers
  • What are the three main religions of the ashanti people of ghana
    8·2 answers
  • What was the main reason for sectional differences that existed in the United States in the early 1800s?
    5·1 answer
  • Examine the following excerpt from Emmeline Pankhurst's speech "Why We
    6·1 answer
  • How was the US to remove its presence in Vietnam? Check all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • King louis xiv was too young to rule when first given the throne. please select the best answer from the choices provided t f
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!