Role of Political Parties is given below.
Explanation:
Political parties perform an important task in government. They bring people together to achieve control of the government, develop policies favorable to their interests or the groups that support them, and organize and persuade voters to elect their candidates to office. Political parties want as many people involved as possible. Most members take a fairly passive role, simply voting for their party's candidates at election time. Some become more active and work as officials in the party or volunteer to persuade people to vote. The most ambitious members may decide to run for office themselves.
Representing groups of interests
The people represented by elected officials are called constituents. Whether Republican or Democrat, constituents make their concerns known to their representatives. Elected officials must not only reflect the concerns of their own political party but must also try to attract support from people in their districts or states who belong to the other party. They can attract this support by supporting bipartisan issues (matters of concern that cross party lines) and nonpartisan issues (matters that have nothing to do with party allegiance).
Simplifying choices
The two main political parties in the United States appeal to as many different groups as possible. They do so by stating their goals in a general way so that voters are attracted to a broad philosophy without necessarily focusing on every specific issue. Republicans are known for their support of business, conservative positions on social issues, and concern about the size of government; Democrats traditionally have supported labor and minorities and believe that government can solve many of the nation's problems.
Making policy
Political parties are not policy making organizations in themselves. They certainly take positions on important policy questions, especially to provide alternatives to the position of whichever party is in power. When in power, a party attempts to put its philosophy into practice through legislation. If a candidate wins office by a large majority, it may mean that the voters have given him or her a mandate to carry out t
Answer:
Explanation:
the landmark 2015 supreme court case obergefell v. hodges legalized what in the united states
Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:
1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.
2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.
<h3>What is a Faulty Conclusion?</h3>
A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.
If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.
Learn more about faulty conclusions here:
brainly.com/question/2141635
Answer:
- How has the government's work been in my community?
- How has the current government administration affected the essential factors of my life?
- How has the government managed the social issues that involve me and that involve other people?
- How is the economy of my region and the country as a whole being managed?
- How is education and security in my region and the country as a whole?
Explanation:
For a government to be considered good and efficient, it must be evaluated in relation to the social and economic elements of each community that makes up the country, region or community. For that, it is necessary to ask questions that make direct use of these factors, which are the biggest responsibility in a region, therefore, the questions that you can ask to assess the quality of the government should be directed to issues of education, trade, security, rights civil and social, protection of minorities, issues related to the use and management of the region's resources, infrastructure, among others.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>In guidelines known as Circular 230, the IRS says that an expert can't charge an unforeseen expense for administrations rendered regarding any issue before the IRS, with three exceptions.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
One place where unexpected charges might be particularly helpful is the <em>place the citizen</em> is attempting to get cash once more from the IRS in a claim. Duty discount suits may loan themselves to unforeseen charges, and the IRS has endorsed <em>unexpected expenses in that unique circumstance</em>.
Truly, truth is stranger than fiction, this is a zone controlled by the IRS. So to begin, regardless of whether your expense guide can offer you benefits on a possibility relies upon what <em>unforeseen charges are permitted by the IRS.</em>