In the context of workplace deviance, this is an example of<u> "property deviance".</u>
More serious instances of deviant behavior destructive to an association concern property deviance. Property deviance is "the place representatives either harm or procure substantial resources… without authorization". This kind of deviance commonly includes burglary however may incorporate "damage, deliberate mistakes in work, abusing cost accounts", among different models.
Answer:
1). Canceling a government-funded project because of a lessened need for job creation
.
2). Cutting taxes to encourage commercial activity.
Explanation:
Fiscal policy is demonstrated as the government's policy in which it adjusts or manipulates its expenditure and tax rates in order to monitor and command the economy of the nation. The policy primarily intends to keep the economy stable.
As per the question, <u>'cancellation of government-funded project' would reduce government's expenditure</u> and prevent the excess supply of money(to contract demand) in the economy to <u>control inflation</u>. While a <u>'cut in tax rates' would increase the flow of money in the economy </u>and increase public borrowings and expenditure that would <u>stimulate economic growth</u>(cope up recession). Thus, <u>options 1 and 2</u> are the correct answers.
The concept of Non-Collaboration refers to the certainty that only black people can argue and fight for freedom, since they are the oppressed people and since white people are part of a group of oppressors. This concept is important in relation to overcoming certain forms of oppression, because it allows people who are oppressed by the racist system to have the authority to speak and show what is really harmful and maleficent, since they go through it and have priority in the subject they live and know. In other words, the importance of Non-Collaboration is to give voice to the oppressed, without being interrupted by the oppressor.
The "non-racialist" philosophies of Ubuntun and African socialism do not agree with this concept. This is because both maintain the idea that states that “my existence is connected to the existence of the other”, which means, for them that the anti-racist and freedom debate of black people needs the participation of white people, since they are part of of the oppressive racist system. In short, for Ubuntun and African Socialism both the oppressed and the oppressor need to participate in the process of liberating blacks.
I agree with the principle of Non-Collaboration in parts. I believe that when it comes to talking about racism, black people have priority as they are the people who suffer from it. In this case, I believe that whites have no place to speak and should be silent, listen and understand. However, I believe that racism will only be fought with the participation of whites, since they were the ones who created this system and they are the people who maintain it today, so I think it is important that whites also participate in this debate; as a listener and not as a speaker.
Answer:
Helen is using <em>personal appeal</em>.
Explanation:
<u>Personal appeal</u><u> is an influence tactic used by one individual to persuade another individual to take or not to take a certain action, in particular. </u>
Here, Helen is <em>appealing</em> to a personal fact, which bonds JP and Helen. By saying that they are friends since the first grade, Helen hopes to persuade JP into deciding that their friendship is more important than the act of theft. Perhaps, even that they might stop being friends if JP reports on her.
A personal appeal can be a very effective influence tactic if used smartly.
Answer:
B} Raw Materials and Cash Crops.
Explanation:
They brought over the cash crop and materials produced by the slaves.
