Answer:
No, they are not. The concept of human races appears to be solidly grounded in present-day biology and our evolutionary history. But if you asked that conference of geneticists to give you a genetic definition of race, they wouldn’t be able to do it. Human races are not natural genetic groups; they are socially constructed categories. Genes certainly reflect geography, but unlike geography, human genetic differences don't fall along obvious natural boundaries that might define races.
Yes, it is believed that one of the first Greek ancient astronomers, and the first notable Greek philosopher, was Thales, who lived at the beginning of the 6th Century BCE.
Predominantly inhabit rain forest ecosystems
<u>Behavior genetics</u> is a field that focuses on how variations in behavior and development in living organism, result from the interaction of genetic and physical environmental factors.
<h3>What is genetics?</h3>
Genetics can be defined as the scientific study of genes, heredity and the similarities or variations of traits (inherited characteristics) in living organisms such as humans, animals and plants.
<h3>The field of genetics.</h3>
Basically, genetics comprises various fields and these include the following:
<u>Behavior genetics</u> is a field that focuses on how variations in behavior and development in living organism, result from the interaction of genetic and physical environmental factors.
Read more on genetics here: brainly.com/question/1548948
Darwin's idea of the survival of the fittest means that certain organisms are more likely to survive with they traits in particular environments. This is because some organisms are more fit to live in a given environment whether it be due to temperature, weather, or predators.
One example is that dark moths are more fit for survival than light moths in many areas because they are able to camouflage against dark tree bark.
Hope this helps.
