Answer:
Centimeters might be easier because they can be much more precise than inches when there isn't an ideal length. Kilometers might be easier because it would not require such large numbers to work with.
Step-by-step explanation:
:)
Exponential growth of the form:
F=Ar^t
F=100(1.22)^t
F(5)=100(1.22)^5
F(5)=270.27
F(5)=270 to the nearest frog...
....
1.22=r^12
r=1.22^(1/12)
F=100(1.22^(1/12)^t)
F=100(1.22^(t/12)) now it will produce monthly populations...
Say we did the same as before but instead of 5 years you have 60 months...
F(60)=100(1.22^(60/12))
F(60)=270 to the nearest frog... :P
D
the answer is D. dilation cannot be used to prove this
We have been given a quadratic function 
and we need to restrict the domain such that it becomes a one to one function.
We know that vertex of this quadratic function occurs at (5,2).
Further, we know that range of this function is 
.
If we restrict the domain of this function to either ![(-\infty,5]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28-%5Cinfty%2C5%5D)
or 
, it will become one to one function.
Let us know find its inverse.
Upon interchanging x and y, we get:
Let us now solve this function for y.
Hence, the inverse function would be 
if we restrict the domain of original function to and the inverse function would be 
if we restrict the domain to .
<span>2x-4y=32
2x-8y=48
--------------subtract
4y = - 16
y = -4
</span>2x-4y=32
2x- 4(-4)=32
2x + 16 = 32
2x = 16
x = 8
answer
(8, -4)
