Answer:
Explanation:
Face value = 1000
market price = 1000
annual yield = 106
yield to maturity = (106/1000) x 100
= 10.6 % .
Answer:
The correct answer is Formal Benchmarking.
Explanation:
The English term "benchmark" comes from the words "bench" (bench, table) and "mark" (brand, sign). In the original meaning of English, the word compound could however be translated as a measure of quality. In other words, benchmarking is a way to determine how well a company performs, compared to others.
In order to be more competitive at present, it is necessary to use benchmarking since it provides strategies that allow identifying the best keys to the company's success, so that by implementing them the organization can be a leading and competitive company in a changing market and global in which business organizations currently have to see each other.
The majority of authors relate benchmarking with competitiveness and business improvement, being "the company" its natural scope. However, the potential benefits of its use make it considered in other areas, such as "public organizations", and at other levels, "sectoral" and "environment" (regional, national and international). This complicates the definition of the concept, since it is a tool that has multiple application possibilities, pursues different objectives in each case, and uses its own methodology in each area.
Answer:
The options are given below:
A. 4.3
B. 20
C. 23
D. 46
The answer is C. 23
Explanation:
In order to calculate this, we would need the following:
- Total number of people watching television in Houston households.
- Total number of people watch the show American Family in Houston households.
From the question above, we have:
- Number of households with televisions = 3,300,000
- Number of households watching the show= 759,000.
To calculate the rating, we have:
(759,000/3,300,000) X 100
0.23 X 100
= 23
Answer:
Weak because of proximate cause is difficult to prove in absence of other similarly affected individuals
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the 60 year old man have a lung cancer so he sues the asbestos manufacturer also he trust that it is unsafe as her friend who use the alternative material has not have a lung cancer so here the case would be weak as of proximate cause as it is difficult for proving it
Therefore the same is to be considered
