<span>This is an example of a multiple-group experimental design. In this formation, there is more than one group that receives both the control variable and the measured variable, and the researcher is looking for whether the experimental variable actually has an effect on the group studied (and if so, to what level).</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is C,2.33
Explanation:
The midpoint formula for elasticity of demand is given as :
percentage change in quantity demand/percentage in price
percentage change in quantity demanded is Q2-Q1/(Q2+Q1)/2*100
percentage change in price is P2-P1/(P2+P1)/2*100
P1=$6.5
P2=$5.75
Q1=600
Q2=800
percentage change quantity demanded =(800-600)/(800+600)/2*100
percentage change quantity demanded=28.57142857
Percentage change in price=(5.75-6.5/(5.75+6.5)/2)*100
percentage change in price=12.24489796
midpoint elasticity of demand=
28.57142857
/2.24489796
=2.33
Answer:
Japan , south korea, America and Europe are developed countries
Explanation:
- <em>Because</em><em> </em><em>These</em><em> </em><em>countries</em><em> </em><em>hasn't</em><em> </em><em>ranked</em><em> </em><em>as </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>corrupt</em><em> </em><em>country.</em>
- <em>These</em><em> </em><em>countries</em><em> </em><em>buildup</em><em> </em><em>every</em><em> </em><em>new</em><em> </em><em>ideas</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>comes</em><em> </em><em>up </em><em>.</em>
- <em>There</em><em> </em><em>is </em><em>a </em><em>proper</em><em> </em><em>facility,</em><em> sufficient</em><em> </em><em>dependable</em><em> </em><em>data</em><em>,</em><em>no </em><em>nepotism</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>manipulation</em><em>.</em>
- <em>There</em><em> </em><em>is </em><em>no </em><em>economical</em><em> </em><em>statistics</em><em>.</em>
- <em>There</em><em> </em><em>e </em><em>proper</em><em> </em><em>education.</em>
- <em>Due</em><em> </em><em>establishment</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>manu</em><em> </em><em>industries</em><em>.</em>
- <em>Good</em><em> </em><em>governance</em>
- <em>There</em><em> </em><em>is </em><em>no </em><em>discrimination</em><em> </em><em>among</em><em> </em><em>people</em><em>.</em>
Answer:
Since this is an example of the colliding task of two different managers, you would have to explain the point of view of the upper level manager and what he/she told you was your duty in the first place.
Even if the assistant manager thinks that not entering the sales is the most efficient idea at the moment, it would be wise to<u> stick to the upper level manager's requirement.</u>
The second course of action would <u>approve the assistant manager's requirement.</u> However, you would have to put out to your upper level manager, in a straightforward manner, that you listened to the assistant manager's suggestion. This is the course of action to opt for if you strongly think that the idea of not entering the sales is correct and won't cause damage that you and the assistant manager will be liable for afterwards.
Answer:
B: $7,300
Explanation:
Cash Balance 1 April $ 14,700
Add: Cash Receipts $ 60,000
Less: Cash Payments <u>$(70,000)</u>
Net Cash Balance $ 4,700 A
Amount to Borrow <u>$ 7,300</u> <u>C</u>
Minimum Cash balance <u>$ 12,000</u> B
B-A = C.
i.e $12,000 - $ 4,700 = $ 7,300