1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
faltersainse [42]
3 years ago
6

In 2001, one county reported that, among 3132 white women who had babies, 94 were multiple births. There were also 20 multiple b

irths to 606 black women. Does this indicate any racial difference in the likelihood of multiple births? Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion in context.
Mathematics
1 answer:
kirza4 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Hypothesis:

The ratio of ladies giving multiple birth to total number of women for any race will be the same.

Test:

Ratio of white women giving multiple births = 94 / 3132 = 0.0300

Ratio of black women giving multiple births = 20 / 606 = 0.0330

Conclusion:

There is no racial difference in the likelihood of multiple births. Although we do see a difference in the ratios calculated above, the difference is small enough to be due to sample size difference of white and black women. The smaller number of total black women makes the ratio calculated from this sample have a higher probability to deviate from what is expected. This deviation will account for the difference in probability between both races.

We can see the effects of this small sample size by increasing or decreases the numerator by 1 for black women:

21 / 606 = 0.0347

19 / 606 = 0.0313

This change in the data of one woman produces a very large percentage change in our ratio for black women (5%). Thus despite inaccuracy due to small sample size, our hypothesis is correct.

You might be interested in
Tim Hortons is hiring and offers $200 every week plus $5 per hour. McDonalds offers $300 every week plus $2 per hour. State the
Ray Of Light [21]

Answer:

Assuming you want better payment each week, any number of hours above 33.333 or 33 hours and 20 minutes per week

Step-by-step explanation:

There are several ways we could do this.  We could say we want to have Tim Hortons be the better employer on the first week, or after so many weeks by adjusting the hours.  I am going to assume we are saying we want it to be a better employer on the first week, so the profit will be the amount made every week plus the money made per hour times the number of hours.

Let's say number of hours is H

So Tim Hortons winds up as 200 + 5H for one week and  Mcdonalds will be 300 + 2H.

If you set the two expressions equal to each other you will find where they intersect, which means at that number of hours they will give the same amount of money while any amount before one of the companies will give more and after that many hours the other will.  Let's go ahead and solve.

200 + 5H = 300 + 2H

3H = 100

H = 100/3

So H is about 33.333.  let's check.

200 + 5(33.333) = 366.665 which rounds to 366.67 dollars

300 + 2(33.333) = 366.666 which also rounds to 366.67 dollars

So at 33.333 hours both give 366.67 dollars.  Let's look at a value below it, say 32.

200 + 5(32) = 360

300 + 2(32) = 364

So you can see here Tim Hortons  pays less.  Now we will try 34 as a value above 33.333

200 + 5(32) = 370

300 + 2(32) = 368

Here Mcdonalds pays less.  This was to show that values below 33.333 make Tim Hortonspay less and values above 33.333 make Mcdonalds pay less.  In other words any value above 33.333 hours will have Tim Hortons be the better employer.  And this is per week

I want to repeat, you can expand this to be multiple weeks and see which of the two becomes better in that epriod of time.  This was, I think, the simplest way to answer though.  

So the conditions where Tim Horton pays more isif you work more than 33.333 hours per week.  This will make them pay more every single week.  

7 0
2 years ago
Name and describe all the angles in the drawing below
rjkz [21]
Acute is a angle of some sort I believe.
7 0
2 years ago
{(-1, -1) (3.8) (2, 4)(2, 3), (7. -7) }
vodka [1.7K]

jStep-by-step explanation:

I cannot see the question

4 0
2 years ago
Factor x^2+ 5x + 6<br> pleaseee
alekssr [168]

Answer:

( x + 2 ) ( x  +3 )

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This question doesn't make sense to me..<br>Please help. 8/21 × 14/4 =​
hjlf
8/21 x 14/5 = 1.06666667
i hope this helps!!
if u need the decimal in a fraction, just lmk
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Evaluate the expression using the distributive property 8(7+7)
    7·2 answers
  • An easy math question for 5 points + 3 points for brainliest!
    13·1 answer
  • A cylinder has a height of 12 m and a volume of 680.64. What is the area of the base?
    11·1 answer
  • Find the domain of the following relation. <br> R={(19,96),(20,101),(21,106),(22,111)}
    12·2 answers
  • ILL MARKE BRAINLIEST IF YOU SHOW YOUR WORK
    10·1 answer
  • 30/1 is equalivalent to
    6·2 answers
  • HELP WITH VOLUME AND SURFACE AREA!!!!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Help please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:):)​
    5·1 answer
  • HELP ASAPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • Can someone please answer 1 for me? Whoever can answer gets brainliest
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!