How should this excerpt be edited to make it more objective? by including direct quotations from the professor about his knowled
ge of the gambling ring by interviewing the department chairman and the professor to get both sides of the story by removing the commentary that the professor is most likely involved in the gambling ring by deleting the department chairman's and professor's names from the article
by removing the commentary that the professor is most likely involved in the gambling ring.
Explanation:
The given excerpt highlights more about Professor Shuman. His involvement in gambling has been more focused rather than on the activity and the ills of the event. In this way, the real issue of the gambling process gets blurred. In order to make the report more objective, the commentary focusing on the professor being involved in the gambling needs to be removed.
