"<span>A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the new government would have limited power" is the best option, since they thought that this would be redundant in a Constitution already given to these ideals. </span>
After searching I discovered your question is multiple choice. The answer choices are as follows:
<span>
A.By using the state constitutions as models, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention avoided almost all disagreements.
B.Most of the U.S. Constitution was directly copied from state constitutions.
C. State constitutions did not guarantee rights, so the authors of the U.S. Constitution included a bill of rights.
D. The people who wrote the state constitutions had learned valuable lessons about writing a constitution.
</span>
The correct choice is A.
Answer:
A. Roads, hospitals, and monuments were built
B. Buddhism spread through missionary monks.
Hi there!
Because this question has been posted before, I'll post my previous response here.
The case of Gibbons v. Ogden was a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1824 concerning the power of the states to regulate interstate commerce. This case involved a steamboat owner, Thomas Gibbons, who did business between New York and New Jersey and the then governor of New Jersey, Aaron Ogden. Gibbons argued that the monopoly Ogden had was a violation of the commerce clause of the Constitution and therefore not valid. This proved to be the case. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court decided that this law conflicted with federal law and the powers the federal government had to regulate interstate commerce. Under the Constitution, Congress has all powers necessary and proper to carry into effect the laws that it passes. This reinforced that clause.
