Answer:
b. social distinctions were more blurred than in europe.
Explanation:
<u>British taxes practically caused the revolution of the colonies</u>, therefore option "A" is not the correct answer.
That various religious and ethnic groups coexisted in the American colonies was no reason for colonists to tend to support British royalty (D).<em> In fact, diversity and immigration were one of the reasons why the thirteen colonies flourished so quickly.</em>
The colonists didn´t feel that British royalty did anything for them as they had to survive on their own, dedicating themselves mainly to agriculture. <u>The difference in wealth between the inhabitants of England and the colonists was very large, therefore the colonists did not feel entitled to the rights of English citizens (C). Not because the American colonies had a great diversity of religious and ethnic groups.</u>
Because the American colonies were home to diverse religious and ethnic groups, social distinctions were more blurred than in Europe (B). In New England, diversity was ironically the point in common that its inhabitants had and that would lead them to fight for their independence.
This is most likely
"<span>
development of antisocial" personality disorder.</span>
A low sense is regularly evident, and additionally a past
filled with wrongdoing, lawful issues, or imprudent and forceful conduct.
Individuals with antisocial personality
disorder<span> have a tendency to irritate, control or treat
others cruelly or with insensitive apathy. They demonstrate no blame or regret
for their conduct. People with antisocial personality
disorder frequently damage
the law, getting to be crooks.</span>
The right word and the correct answer is Integrity.
Integrity- can also be called as honesty, honor, etc. It is where an individual is in a state of being whole and having a quality of being honest and yes, having strong moral principle is also considered as a synonym of integrity.
One person can claim integrity if he/she has the capability of doing right things in a reliable way.
I'm not sure of the exact word you are looking for, but the general idea is that the federal law will always reign supreme if there is ever a conflict between the federal and state laws. Federal law is superior or higher-ranking or more preferable, etc.
Here is the exact phrasing from Article VI of the US Constitution: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."
In August 1786, Revolutionary War veteran Daniel Shays led an armed rebellion in ... policies and political corruption of the Massachusetts state legislature. ... Popular uprisings like Shays's rebellion raised the urgent question of whether .