Answer:
The answer is a. Ingratiating tactic.
Explanation:
This technique involves becoming more liekable to a person in order to influence their behaviour. This can be done in a variety of ways, such as flattery, comformity of opinions and the use of humour.
Ingratiating has been studied in business. For example, an experiment found out that waiters who used ingratiating tactics received larger tips.
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
Answer:
Interior!
Explanation:
Hopefully this helps! If this wasn't the answer you were looking for please don't hesitate to private message me or comment here. Have a nice day/night! :)
<span>Under federal law, teachers are protected from discrimination in employment except on the basis of orientation.</span>
Answer:
C, blood type
Explanation:
Socialization means the activity of mixing socially with others or the process of learning how to behave and interact with others.
Most of socialization skills are learned at home, later at school, then through friends, exposure to culture and media and also through travelling.
<em>Blood type</em> does not influence a person's socialization because it has absolutely nothing to do with it, blood is a liquid in the body needed to survive and everybody has it. Gender, class and race all contribute to a person's socialization because these factors determine a person's way of thinking and their way of behavior towards others. There are some specific way of conduct restricted to gender and race which influence a person's level of socialization, being of a particular social class is a factor as well.