Answer:
<em>b: hopes it will destroy the hatred between the two families.</em>
I feel like b isn’t grammatically correct, so I’ll go with a.
In human relations, the irritation threshold is the <u>point at which a person notices something and becomes annoyed.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Relationships are every now and again jeopardized on the grounds that one of the people has an aggravating propensity or quirk that disturbs the other. Human relations is the way toward preparing representatives, tending to their needs, encouraging a work environment culture and settling clashes between various workers or between workers, the board and some more.
The primary aggravating edge was corrupting, Harsh or boisterous voice, Irritating chuckle, Dominating discussions, particularly in gatherings, and so forth... These are regularly used to intend to affront somebody as a result of their sex or race which prompts separately. Since in human relations, the disturbance limit is where an individual notification something and gets irritated.
The answer to this question is D
The correct answer is A. The passage appeals to logos.
Explanation:
The appeal to logos focuses on supporting the author's point of view by using reasoning. This occurs in the excerpt presented because the author of this text uses reasoning or logical arguments to explain how the Declaration of independence includes all men no matter their race, religion, etc. This can be seen in "It does not say some men, but it says all men" that explain the author's main point, as well as, logical reasons such as "does not say all Protestants, but it says all men, which includes Catholics" because this argument is a conclusion that can be drawn using logic. This means the author relies on logic and reason, which makes this passage to use the appeal to logos.
