Answer:
I believe your answer would be so the character can directly share his or her thoughts with the reader.
Explanation:
A is the only option that makes sense because choice B would be Third-Person omniscient, while C would most likely be either Third-Person omniscient or limited. Either way, First-Person shares the narrator's point of view, so the reader cannot know more than the character does.
<em>♥A.W.E.</em><u><em>S.W.A.N.</em></u><em>♥</em>
There are two people holding on to the edge of a cliff. One is your mother, one is your grandfather. The cliff is weak under the three of you so you only have time to save one person. Who would you save? I would try to figure out who is more at risk, and I would consider the condition of both my mother and my grandfather. In the end I would either try to save both and risk the death of all three of us, or save my mother who is young and healthy.
Copy and paste, hope this helps! <3
Answer:
The similarities in the works of both authors showed that they both love nature.
From both literary works, Basho and Wordsworth love nature and this can be seen in their works. They both stated that nature is important as it beautifies the environment and it's vital to our existence.
The difference between their literary works was that while Wordsworth was the partaker in the action and narrator, Basho was an observer. Wordsworth used the first-person point of view
Also, the majority of Woodsworth's words are adjectives while Basho followed the haiku tradition.
Explanation:
The answer is the line "Who, not by strength subdued me, but by wine."
In the excerpt, "wine" means the idea of conversation, wit and charm. Odysseus beat him by talking and having conversation with him but in the end he tricked him.
It depends on Static Electricity.
