Answer: there were two immediate ones: America's support the ongoing struggle by Cubans and Filipinos against Spanish rule, and the mysterious explosion of the battleship U.S.S. Maine in Havana Harbor.
Explanation:
Answer: One major difference is that King's believes that slavery didn't play a role, while Burns' does. A historical event that could support King's is when Congress established the Freedmen's Bureau in 1865. This provided aid to African Americans in their transition from slavery to freedom. A historical event that could support Burns' is Dred Scott v. Sandford. The case in 1857 declared that slaves and blacks descended from slaves and were not American citizens and cannot sue, so this could have led to outrage and war.
Although Franco had never been a member of a political party, the growing anarchy impelled him to appeal to the government to declare a state of emergency. His appeal was refused, and he was removed from the general staff and sent to an obscure command in the Canary Islands.
How international affairs should be handled by the president is not the major compromises during the constitution convention included.
Option D
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
There were some important as well as some major compromises that were taken at the time of the constitution convention. These things included how the slaves and servants should be taken into count while estimating the population of a particular country. Also, added to this, how people should represent themselves in the congress should also be calculated.
The only thing that is not taken into consideration is that, how the international policies and affairs should be handled by the president of a country. This does not actually comes under this compromise taken by the government.