1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gemiola [76]
3 years ago
6

Argue for or against the limitation of speed limits.

English
1 answer:
Ipatiy [6.2K]3 years ago
6 0
Since this is an opinion question you can take it either way.

Pros:
 - lower speed may cause lower speed accidents, which are less deadly         than their high speed alternatives
 - lower speed could potentially allow people to get lost less often because        they are able to navigate and respond earlier
 <span>- gas savings from optimal operating conditions                                            (between 88.5 - 96.5 km/h [55-60 mph])</span>

Cons:
 - longer commute times
 - less enjoyable (if you enjoy driving fast)
 - may contribute to overall congestion and increase in accidents as              people spend more time on average on the roads

Either way, support our opinion and you'll be right.
You might be interested in
Commonlit answer key for different ways
Luda [366]

Answer:

thats not a normal question

Explanation:

id k what to put

5 0
2 years ago
Which term best describes the use of verbs in the following sentence?
dlinn [17]

Answer:

it is a active voice cause the subject is performing the action

subject is campground

6 0
3 years ago
Analyzing creon's speech from Antigone
kondaur [170]

Explanation:

was the only one present who had said nothing. For some time he had sat silent beside Bilbo's empty chair, and ignored all remarks and questions. He had enjoyed the joke, of course, even though he had been in the know.

3 0
3 years ago
HELP ME OUT PLEASE!
koban [17]

The characteristics listed in the table describes:

  • <u>A Federalist</u>

  • A Federalist is a person that is a strong believer in the federal government of the United States. Such a person believes in a powerful central government which would have the ability to adequately control the other states.

  • A Federalist is of the opinion that the Bill of Rights is not needed, that the Separation of powers is necessary to protect the people, and that no branch of government controls the other as a result of checks and balances.

  • Conversely,an Anti-Federalist would be of the opinion that a bill of rights is needed and that the central government should not have all the power.

  • Therefore, the correct answer is option C

Read more here:

brainly.com/question/18278815

5 0
2 years ago
Which thesis statement can be developed into a research paper with a clear opinion and supporting arguments?
AnnZ [28]

I believe it is going to be C but I may be incorrect.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain the relationship between confusion and growth in the text. Cite evidence from the text to support your response.
    13·1 answer
  • A subject with at least two parts joined by and, or, or nor is
    8·1 answer
  • What dose "his massive rack was a teeter totter rocking back and forth as he made his getaway"mean
    6·2 answers
  • What is the literal definition of a word called
    7·1 answer
  • Your friend, Jamie, rolled a number cube and got the number 5. On his next turn, he says he won’t be able to roll another 5 beca
    7·2 answers
  • Think about how the U.S. Constitution came about. Describe the reasons why the Founding Fathers decided to create a new document
    5·1 answer
  • 1. English (speak ).................. in many plaes in the world
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP P2
    7·1 answer
  • What does this quote mean? “ Do not tell secrets to those whose faith and silence you have not already tested. “ - Queen elizabe
    15·1 answer
  • Write a story with these words plisss
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!