Answer:
I'm not sure but to having a profound sense of loneliness and isolation.
Explanation:
The correct answer is close.
If an author uses a close narrative style, it means that he or she is paying special attention to the characters they want to develop and bring closer to the readers/audience. If the character is unreliable, or reliable, or distant, that's not going to help the audience much to understand the character in-depth. That's why authors opt for a close narrative style instead.
Answer:rr
Explanation: I dont speak spanishj
1) The correct answer is: B) Developing
The word <em>develop </em>means to invent something or bring something into existence. <em>Refine</em> refers to the improvement of the idea by making small changes, that means the idea already exists, it is only modified.
2) The correct answer is: A) Refining
The word <em>focus </em>refers to pay attention to something, in this case an idea. From the options given, <em>refine </em>is the best choice as the idea already exists and improvement is needed. To do that, you need to focus on it paying attention to the small details.
3) The correct answer is: B) Well
Remember the difference between <em>good </em>and <em>well </em>is that the first one is and adjetive so it is used to modify nouns, and the second one is an adverd used to modify verbs. Fore example: you can be a <em>good </em>citizen, or you can read a <em>good </em>book. In the other hand: the car ran <em>well </em>or the kid played <em>well</em>.
4) The correct answer is: B) Tastier
Remember that to make comparatives and superlatives an -<em>er </em>or -<em>est </em>is used with most of one syllable adjectives and with certain two syllable ones. In this case <em>more </em>or <em>most </em>is not used because tasty has only two syllables. And you use the -<em>er </em>because you are comparing the meal with others.
This is for lord of the Rings return of the King
1. Frodo was appointed the task of Ring-bearer to destroy the One Ring by casting it into the fiery depths of Mount Doom and thus to get rid of it for all eternity. however, after all of the indescribable suffering and effort it took to arrive at the actual chasm of Mount Doom and the ability to put an end to all evil was within reach of his hand, Frodo was unable to give it up...instead, he succumbed to the evil power of the Ring and took it for himself. in fact, it was Gollum who ultimately cast the ring into the fire and without the wretched creature, the Ring would not have been destroyed and the entire Quest would have been in vain. Tolkien definitely utilizes irony in this passage.
2. the Witch-king of Angmar was defeated by two of the most unlikely heroes, a woman in disguise and a Hobbit, namely Éowyn and Pippin. the Witch-king, Lord of the Nazgûl, was Sauron's deadliest and most feared servant who thought he was invincible for 'no man could kill him', according to a legendary prophecy. even Gandalf couldn't even defeat him during a brief showdown between the two (as shown in a scene from the movie before the Rohirrim arrive upon the siege of Minas Tirith). instead, the Witch-king met his demise at the sword of a woman who was forbidden to fight by her kin and of a Hobbit, a creature whom many doubted of their strength in battle.
oh! and another idea that just popped into my head is how ironic it is that in all these years leading up to the great climactic events of the War of the Ring, Aragorn - the destined King, heir to the throne of Gondor, and the last descendant of the Dúnedain (which is all a pretty impressive lineage if you ask me!) - chose to instead cloak himself in the lifestyle of a Ranger and go into exile, rather than face his fate. of course, Aragorn realizes his destiny and becomes the King he was born to be...thus the "Return of the King"! :D
