If this is an excerpt from a story, I wouldn’t be of much help. But from a layman's perspective, it seems like the character is attempting to please the failed humorist or he or she would have been frank. This in turn may have triggered a chain reaction, prompting the humorist to continue with his jokes which would have further affected the character. He or she is also giving the former a false sense of happiness and appreciation.
This passage may not affect the whole story in a remarkably discernible manner, but it definitely proves the character's penchant for politeness. And that may be be a deciding factor in his or her further decisions that ultimately define the plot of the story.
Answer:
C) Stephen should restate what he read in the article using his own words.
Explanation:
He needed to paraphrase the artical in his own words
Answer:
if no one tried to think critically, then everyone would be in a tizzy. critical thinking is logical and comes from an analytical perspective, and if this form of thought was gone, we would be left with emotional thinking. with emotional thinking, people will act on how they feel, rather than a logical explanation. the world would go crazy and be a mess of emotional beings who let their feelings get in the way of logic.
Explanation:
What is written in bold is the subject, <em>what is written in italic is the predicate </em><u><em>and what is underlined is the object. </em></u>
Maria <em>is playing with her</em> <u>dolls</u>
He <em>is repairing his </em><u>laptop</u>
Ann <em>is driving her</em><u> car</u>
Arnold <em>is jumping the </em><u>fence</u>
Dad <em>is writing a</em><u> letter</u>.
The Subject in a sentence is the noun or the pronoun which performs and action, the action performed is the predicate in which we find the verb. The object is a noun or a pronoun which is acted upon by the subject.
