The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)<span> required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be </span>informed<span> of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights. </span>
<span>The Exclusionary Rule prohibits evidence or testimony obtained illegally or in violation of the constitution from being used against the defendant in court. </span>
<span>The </span>Miranda<span> ruling has been revised somewhat by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. On June 1, 2010, the Roberts' Court released the opinion for </span>Berghuis v. Thompkins,<span> 08-1470 (2010), which held a defendant must </span>invoke<span> his right to remain silent (by stating he wants to remain silent), rather than </span>waive<span>it (by explicitly agreeing to answer questions before interrogation). </span>
There is so many reasons but they are complicated to explain
Answer:
Somebody ...Wanted ...But ...So ...North KoreaRevenge against JapanThe United Nationswanted to keep peaceThe Korean War beganGeneral MacArthurTo take over ChinaHe had to follow the rules of the United NationsHe stopped trying to proceedinto ChinaPresident TrumanTo avoid another world warGeneral MacArthurwanted to invade China and take matters into his own handsHe relieved General MacArthur of his dutiesChinaTo help North Korea fight against the United Nations and South KoreaThe war ended when they came into playThey stayed a communist countryUnited NationsPeace and to keep the world from going to another world warThey had to become involved inanother war to keep peace between KoreaThey helped South Korea in their fight against North
I HOPE THIS HELPS YOU AND IF IS NOT JUST LET ME KNOW AND I WILL SEE OTHER WAYS TO HELP YOU THANKS>>>>
Answer:
1 Government
Explanation:
I say its government out of these choices because we had Government before a telephone and a microwave and all of them are still an effect today.
