<em>Kinship</em> is a system of social organization that takes it's name from kin relationships, and it refers to the relationships based on blood, or marriage.
Answer:
Evolutionary Theory.
<em>The Evolutionary Theory is one of the 4 main theories on how the state was originated. </em>
The Evolutionary Theory says that the heads of the households eventually would become the government. It is compared to the kinship system were the head of the household usually is the father or the mother. This theory can be applied to tribal communities were the head of the family became a leader.
Scarcity refers to the basic economic problem, the gap between limited – that is, scarce – resources and theoretically limitless wants. This situation requires people to make decisions about how to allocate resources efficiently, in order to satisfy basic needs and as many additional wants as possible.
Brigadier General Rutherford i think....
The British soldiers had every right to start fire at the Boston colonists The British soldiers were being attacked by the colonists. The colonists were throwing harmful objects toward the British people. The British officials were nervous even thought the soldiers were rude to the colonists it gave them no reasoning to endanger the officials or them selves. The colonists named this event the Boston Massacre which took place on March, 1770 and made it seem as thought it was all of the soldiers fault, But in all reality the colonists played a big role leading to the Boston Massacre
Hope it helps :)
Best answer to that question is likely this: The League of Nations lacked strong leadership.
Explanation:
The United States never joined the League of Nations, in spite of the fact that an organization such as the League of Nations was the signature idea of US President Woodrow Wilson. He had laid out 14 Points for establishing and maintaining world peace following the Great War (World War I). Point #14 was the establishment of an international peacekeeping association. The Treaty of Versailles adopted that idea, but back home in the United States, there was not support for involving America in any association that could diminish US sovereignty over its own affairs or involve the US again in wars beyond those pertinent to the United States' own national security. The lack of involvement by the world's fastest-growing superpower, the United States, hampered its effectiveness.
The League of Nations had set out clear goals for what it intended to do. The main aims of the League were disarmament across nations, preventing war through collective security of the international community, settling disputes between countries through negotiation, and improving welfare of people around the globe. But it proved unable to meet those goals. The United Nations today has similar goals, and has been more effective in its efforts -- though there are still plenty of people who criticize the UN's effectiveness.
