Answer:
Not at all.
The group of men who met in Philadelphia were tasked with proposing amendments to the Articles of Confederation … and they could’ve done just that! Likewise, there was a faction within this group that would’ve preffered to establish a constitutional monarchy. In fact, that group might’ve had their proposal adopted if George Washington said yes.
To say that the Constitution was inevitable is to ignore the history of the Revolutionary War, the political intrigues that surrounded the Continental Congress, and the sectional differences of the United States. Indeed, it is probably a misnomer to even call them the United States at that time. Most folks of the era were much more interested in local or state politics. The national government was a political deadend for most politicians at the time.
I also think that one of the most overlooked aspects of the Constitutional Convention was the enormous recognition of human nature that prevaded the delegates. Many had huge egos, and several were morally bankrupt (even by the standards of the day). However, all of them accepted that human nature was imperfect, flawed, and fundamentally sinful. This ultimately led to several compromises that created what we call the Constitution. But, it didn’t have to be this way.
When you stop to consider just how many “lucky” coincidences had to occur to produce this document, it’s very easy to realize that the Constitution was never inevitable and it still isn’t today.
Explanation:
Answer:
sociology is the study of development, structure, and functioning of human society. Or the study of social studies. Hope this help! :)
Answer: i will say you all types of democracy
Explanation: Types of democracy refers to pluralism of governing structures such as governments (local through to global) and other constructs like workplaces, families, community associations, and so forth. Types of democracy can cluster around values. For example, some like direct democracy, electronic democracy, participatory democracy, real democracy, deliberative democracy, and pure democracy strive to allow people to participate equally and directly in protest, discussion, decision-making, or other acts of politics. Different types of democracy - like representative democracy - strive for indirect participation as this procedural approach to collective self-governance is still widely considered the only means for the more or less stable democratic functioning of mass societies.[1] Types of democracy can be found across time, space, and language.[2] In the English language the noun "democracy" has been modified by 2,234 adjectives.[3] These adjectival pairings, like atomic democracy or Zulu democracy, act as signal words that point not only to specific meanings of democracy but to groups, or families, of meaning as well.
Answer: higher, smaller
Explanation:
The scale is the relationship between the depicted feature on a map and its real size.
Compared to a small scale map, large scale maps depict a smaller amount of geographic area with a higher amount of detail and have smaller denominators in their representative fractions.
On the other hand, small-scale maps illustrate vast areas in a proportionately small size, have little detail, and larger denominators in their representative fractions.
